Both the Russell 1000 and the S&P 500 are treated as the barometers of the US stock market; however, the two indices are different by design. The Russell 1000 follows a straightforward and transparent methodology, whereas the S&P 500 is presided over by a committee that makes decisions on stock inclusion and exclusion. These differences in methodology often lead to a lag in the S&P in stock inclusion timeline.
What does our research mean for investors?
We help investors understand the methodology differences between the Russell 1000 and the S&P so that they can efficiently and accurately select the right index as their benchmark based on their objectives and purposes.
Points of differentiation - Russell 1000 and the S&P 500:
- The Russell 1000 possesses a more straightforward and transparent methodology, compared to S&P 500’s committee decision on stock inclusion and exclusion
- The design of quarterly IPO additions in the Russell 1000 allows the inclusion of newly listed US stock prior to the annual reconstitution in June, as long as they meet the criteria
Key takeaways:
- The inclusion timeline of eligible stocks differs in the Russell 1000 and S&P 500 primarily due to the differences of index methodologies
- Companies join the Russell 1000 when they meet the index inclusion rules, the fastest growing companies could be added to the index months after its IPO
- 14 Companies were added to the S&P 500 in 2023, however, some of these stocks were listed on exchanges years ago, and some of them had long been leaders in their respective industries prior to 2023
- The inclusion timeline of eligible stocks differs in the Russell 1000 and S&P 500 primarily due to the differences of index methodologies.
The chart below shows the impact this can have on performance, click on the bars to see the IPO date and when the stock was added to each index.