Sune Mortensen
Sarlota Hohwald
Our latest sponsored research delves into the dynamics of the wealth industry today – delivering some real-world insights that will shape key wealth trends in 2024 and beyond. In this, the third in the series, we delve into investor trust in AI.
- In late 2023, LSEG sponsored detailed research to better understand changing preferences and emerging trends within the wealth industry.
- We asked investors across the globe about how changes in the wealth industry are impacting them.
- This insight looks specifically at investor trust in AI.
Investigating investor trust in AI
In this, the third in this series that looks at the evolution of the wealth industry – and the impact of this evolution on advisors, investors, wealth firms, brokerages, and other industry stakeholders – we focus on investor trust in AI.
Five key findings from our research include:
- Providers agree that AI will change the way they operate:
A substantial 69% of providers agree that “AI will significantly change the way my firm works”.
Furthermore, almost all identify themselves at advanced (48%) or mid-implementation (44%) for AI automation.
Just 8% are at the early implementation stages and 1% are at the planning stage.
AI will reshape the investment landscape
- Respondents are willing or somewhat willing to harness AI:
Respondents were asked if they would be willing or somewhat willing to use AI-enabled processes for a range of tasks.
Across all regions, respondents were:
* Most likely to use AI to research products and services, with 91% in EMEA, 92% in North America and 95% in APAC saying they were willing or somewhat willing to do so.
* Least willing to use AI-enabled processes to manage their investment portfolios directly, with percentages dropping to 43%, 53% and 43% respectively.
- AI does not appear to be a reality for several areas of work – yet:
When asked about the areas in which their firm has already implemented AI use cases, under half of respondents had done so across all areas of work listed. Some examples of the areas listed include, but are not limited to, investment advisory, investment research, financial planning and fraud detection. Implementation is highest in investment research (46%) and investment advisory (44%).
Firms are more confident they will be implementing AI across several key areas in the next 3 years – half or more of firms expect to implement AI for financial planning (50%), investment research (51%) and investment advisory (56%) within three years.
AI is still far from the preferred approach for several activities
- North American investors appear more open to handling activities through AI:
AI is still far from the preferred approach for many activities, but those in North America are significantly more likely to prefer this approach in activities such as:
* Researching products and services (29%, as compared to 13% in APAC and 14% in EMEA).
* Portfolio rebalancing (23% as compared to 12% in APAC and 14% in EMEA).
- There appears to be agreement that AI will reshape the investment landscape, but regional differences are apparent:
North American investors are significantly less likely to invest through big brand retailers or tech companies than those in other regions, with 45% in the region saying they would do so, as opposed to 53% in EMEA and 54% in APAC.
North American investors are also significantly less likely than others to stop using an investment advisor by 2030 because of advances in tech (48% compared to 57% in EMEA and 56% in APAC).
Drilling down
Let’s take a closer look at these key take-aways and unpack what these insights mean for wealth industry players.
These findings confirm that AI is indeed shaping the investment landscape – and will continue to do so with greater momentum into the future. With a substantial 69% of providers of the opinion that AI will significantly change the way their firm works, it is evident that a sea change is underway. Not only this, but the vast majority are moving forward with AI implementation. Very few are lagging.
Providers agree that AI will change the way they operate
This is supported by a general willingness to incorporate AI into the investment process – but trust in technology does not yet extend to all areas of the investment process. Whilst many respondents are comfortable with AI-enabled research into products and services, the percentages in favour drop significantly when it comes to managing investment portfolios directly.
This suggests that trust in technology still has some way to go and that investors still largely value human input into the decision-making involved in managing a portfolio. This supports our view that a hybrid digital and advice model will gain traction going forward.
While in certain areas, the implementation of AI is lagging, many are confident that they will be implementing it across several key areas in the next 3 years, suggesting continued momentum in the adoption of AI within the wealth industry.
Regional differences are apparent, with investors in North America holding different views to those in APAC and EMEA in several key areas.
Interestingly, although those in North America are significantly more likely to prefer AI in certain investment activities than those in other areas, they are also much less likely to stop using an investment advisor because of advances in tech.
Once again, this suggests support for a hybrid investment model, and underscores the fact that the new normal in investments holds ample space – and opportunity – for both advisors and those catering to the self-directed market.
About the research
Conducted by ThoughtLab, the research included two global surveys, one of 2,000 investors across countries, wealth levels, ages, lifestyles, occupations, genders and other characteristics, and the second of senior executives at 250 investment providers.
Some key areas probed included: how the role of financial advice is evolving; the impact of experience on investor behaviour; attitudes towards and adoption of AI in investment; and gaps in the sustainable investment space.
The research covered four regions – Asia Pacific, Europe, the Middle East, and North America. By wealth level, the largest shares comprised mass affluent (25%) and high net worth (25%), followed by very high net worth (18%). By age, the largest share consisted of Gen X (31%), followed by Baby Boomers (30%).
The study also included a benchmarking survey of senior executives from a cross section of 250 wealth management firms, from independent wealth advisors and private banks to wealth management divisions within regional and international banks.
Legal Disclaimer
Republication or redistribution of LSE Group content is prohibited without our prior written consent.
The content of this publication is for informational purposes only and has no legal effect, does not form part of any contract, does not, and does not seek to constitute advice of any nature and no reliance should be placed upon statements contained herein. Whilst reasonable efforts have been taken to ensure that the contents of this publication are accurate and reliable, LSE Group does not guarantee that this document is free from errors or omissions; therefore, you may not rely upon the content of this document under any circumstances and you should seek your own independent legal, investment, tax and other advice. Neither We nor our affiliates shall be liable for any errors, inaccuracies or delays in the publication or any other content, or for any actions taken by you in reliance thereon.
Copyright © 2024 London Stock Exchange Group. All rights reserved.
The content of this publication is provided by London Stock Exchange Group plc, its applicable group undertakings and/or its affiliates or licensors (the “LSE Group” or “We”) exclusively.
Neither We nor our affiliates guarantee the accuracy of or endorse the views or opinions given by any third party content provider, advertiser, sponsor or other user. We may link to, reference, or promote websites, applications and/or services from third parties. You agree that We are not responsible for, and do not control such non-LSE Group websites, applications or services.
The content of this publication is for informational purposes only. All information and data contained in this publication is obtained by LSE Group from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human and mechanical error as well as other factors, however, such information and data are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. You understand and agree that this publication does not, and does not seek to, constitute advice of any nature. You may not rely upon the content of this document under any circumstances and should seek your own independent legal, tax or investment advice or opinion regarding the suitability, value or profitability of any particular security, portfolio or investment strategy. Neither We nor our affiliates shall be liable for any errors, inaccuracies or delays in the publication or any other content, or for any actions taken by you in reliance thereon. You expressly agree that your use of the publication and its content is at your sole risk.
To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, LSE Group, expressly disclaims any representation or warranties, express or implied, including, without limitation, any representations or warranties of performance, merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, accuracy, completeness, reliability and non-infringement. LSE Group, its subsidiaries, its affiliates and their respective shareholders, directors, officers employees, agents, advertisers, content providers and licensors (collectively referred to as the “LSE Group Parties”) disclaim all responsibility for any loss, liability or damage of any kind resulting from or related to access, use or the unavailability of the publication (or any part of it); and none of the LSE Group Parties will be liable (jointly or severally) to you for any direct, indirect, consequential, special, incidental, punitive or exemplary damages, howsoever arising, even if any member of the LSE Group Parties are advised in advance of the possibility of such damages or could have foreseen any such damages arising or resulting from the use of, or inability to use, the information contained in the publication. For the avoidance of doubt, the LSE Group Parties shall have no liability for any losses, claims, demands, actions, proceedings, damages, costs or expenses arising out of, or in any way connected with, the information contained in this document.
LSE Group is the owner of various intellectual property rights ("IPR”), including but not limited to, numerous trademarks that are used to identify, advertise, and promote LSE Group products, services and activities. Nothing contained herein should be construed as granting any licence or right to use any of the trademarks or any other LSE Group IPR for any purpose whatsoever without the written permission or applicable licence terms.