Sarlota Hohwald
Sune Mortensen
Our latest sponsored research delves into the dynamics of the wealth industry today – and unpacks some real-world insights that will shape key wealth trends in 2024 and beyond.
- In late 2023, LSEG sponsored detailed research to better understand changing preferences and emerging trends within the wealth industry.
- We asked investors across the globe about how changes in the wealth industry are impacting them.
- This blog looks specifically at how the role of financial advice is changing.
What investors think about the changing wealth industry
Conducted by ThoughtLab, the research included two global surveys, one of 2,000 investors across countries, wealth levels, ages, lifestyles, occupations, genders and other characteristics, and the second of senior executives at 250 investment providers.
Some key areas probed included: how the role of financial advice is evolving; the impact of experience on investor behaviour; attitudes towards and adoption of AI in investment; and gaps in the sustainable investment space.
In this, the first in a series of blogs that explores the evolution of the wealth industry – and the impact of this evolution on advisors, investors, wealth firms, brokerages and other industry stakeholders – we focus on how the role of financial advice is changing, and what this means for advisors and other industry stakeholders.
Key take-aways
Five important headline findings revealed by our research include:
- Using a financial advisor is generally more common among older investors. According to our research, three quarters (75%) of investors aged 59 to 77 and 70% of investors aged 78+ use an advisor. In contrast, just 25% of those aged 27 to 42 use an advisor.
% of investors, categorised by age, who use a financial advisor
- Those that use a financial advisor are more likely to be ‘very’ satisfied with performance, but also, much less likely to be ‘very/somewhat satisfied’:
- In the 12 months preceding the research, 67% of those who do not use an advisor and 57% of those who do use an advisor are ‘very’ or ‘somewhat’ satisfied.
- That said, those using advisors are far more likely to be ‘very’ satisfied than those who don’t, with figures revealing 21% and 12% respectively, suggesting that self-service solutions are perhaps not yet fully developed.
- There is a consistent view on the value of advisors – regardless of whether respondents use one or not, with 45% of those who use an advisor and 51% of those who don’t saying that the greatest potential value an advisor can add in the next 3 years is to provide trusted investment advice.
- Most investors (51%) agree they are more willing to pay for financial advice when faced with market volatility and complexity, but a majority (54%) also think that, because of advances in tech, they won’t be using one by 2030.
- Loyalty to advisors will remain robust, although investors in EMEA (74%) appear to be less convinced than those in North America (82%) or APAC (81%) that they should continue with a financial advisor over the next 3 years.
Drilling down
Let’s take a closer look at these key take-aways and unpack what these insights mean for wealth industry players.
A key theme to emerge from our research is the role of trust within the industry. This thread of trust begins with trust in data and technology and runs through to the foundational role of trust in a successful advisor/client relationship.
The rapidly accelerating digitalisation that continues to transform the wealth industry is changing both advisor roles and client experiences in myriad ways, but trust remains the bedrock.
Assessing the dynamic wealth environment through the lens of financial advice and its future role, it becomes clear that the role of the advisor in the investment equation needs to pivot. Going forward, advisors will need to demonstrate that the advisor/client relationship adds real and tangible value, specifically through personalisation and the delivery of trusted advice.
Areas of greatest advisory value for investors, categorised by use of a financial advisor
We expect that a hybrid digital and advice model will gain traction in the long run, with providers needing to strike the right balance to service the diverse needs of their customers. To remain relevant, advisors will need to leverage next-level tech to help them provide streamlined, digital support that is cost-effective, but also allows for personalised touch points that maintain the trust relationship.
Consistency in data and the customer experience across all models – advisor-led, digital and hybrid – and across all channels will be extremely important.
In short, our findings reveal that, despite ongoing digitalisation, the value that advisors bring to the table is not in question. Although it is clear that their role must continue to evolve against a changing wealth backdrop, the efficient use of technology can empower advisors to boost their productivity, easily access broad and deep data, and deliver value-added insights that will underscore their most valuable offering: trust.
% of investors, categorised by use of a financial advisor, who do not expect to be using an advisor by 2030 due to technology advances
About the research
The research covered four regions – Asia Pacific, Europe, the Middle East, and North America. By wealth level, the largest shares comprised mass affluent (25%) and high net worth (25%), followed by very high net worth (18%). By age, the largest share consisted of Gen X (31%), followed by Baby Boomers (30%).
The study also included a benchmarking survey of senior executives from a cross section of 250 wealth management firms, from independent wealth advisors and private banks to wealth management divisions within regional and international banks.
Legal Disclaimer
Republication or redistribution of LSE Group content is prohibited without our prior written consent.
The content of this publication is for informational purposes only and has no legal effect, does not form part of any contract, does not, and does not seek to constitute advice of any nature and no reliance should be placed upon statements contained herein. Whilst reasonable efforts have been taken to ensure that the contents of this publication are accurate and reliable, LSE Group does not guarantee that this document is free from errors or omissions; therefore, you may not rely upon the content of this document under any circumstances and you should seek your own independent legal, investment, tax and other advice. Neither We nor our affiliates shall be liable for any errors, inaccuracies or delays in the publication or any other content, or for any actions taken by you in reliance thereon.
Copyright © 2024 London Stock Exchange Group. All rights reserved.
The content of this publication is provided by London Stock Exchange Group plc, its applicable group undertakings and/or its affiliates or licensors (the “LSE Group” or “We”) exclusively.
Neither We nor our affiliates guarantee the accuracy of or endorse the views or opinions given by any third party content provider, advertiser, sponsor or other user. We may link to, reference, or promote websites, applications and/or services from third parties. You agree that We are not responsible for, and do not control such non-LSE Group websites, applications or services.
The content of this publication is for informational purposes only. All information and data contained in this publication is obtained by LSE Group from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human and mechanical error as well as other factors, however, such information and data are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. You understand and agree that this publication does not, and does not seek to, constitute advice of any nature. You may not rely upon the content of this document under any circumstances and should seek your own independent legal, tax or investment advice or opinion regarding the suitability, value or profitability of any particular security, portfolio or investment strategy. Neither We nor our affiliates shall be liable for any errors, inaccuracies or delays in the publication or any other content, or for any actions taken by you in reliance thereon. You expressly agree that your use of the publication and its content is at your sole risk.
To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, LSE Group, expressly disclaims any representation or warranties, express or implied, including, without limitation, any representations or warranties of performance, merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, accuracy, completeness, reliability and non-infringement. LSE Group, its subsidiaries, its affiliates and their respective shareholders, directors, officers employees, agents, advertisers, content providers and licensors (collectively referred to as the “LSE Group Parties”) disclaim all responsibility for any loss, liability or damage of any kind resulting from or related to access, use or the unavailability of the publication (or any part of it); and none of the LSE Group Parties will be liable (jointly or severally) to you for any direct, indirect, consequential, special, incidental, punitive or exemplary damages, howsoever arising, even if any member of the LSE Group Parties are advised in advance of the possibility of such damages or could have foreseen any such damages arising or resulting from the use of, or inability to use, the information contained in the publication. For the avoidance of doubt, the LSE Group Parties shall have no liability for any losses, claims, demands, actions, proceedings, damages, costs or expenses arising out of, or in any way connected with, the information contained in this document.
LSE Group is the owner of various intellectual property rights ("IPR”), including but not limited to, numerous trademarks that are used to identify, advertise, and promote LSE Group products, services and activities. Nothing contained herein should be construed as granting any licence or right to use any of the trademarks or any other LSE Group IPR for any purpose whatsoever without the written permission or applicable licence terms.