Dewi John
On the scale of exposure to oil and gas stocks, UK “light green” equity funds are browner than US and European non-ESG funds.
This reflects a structural bias in the underlying indices. Energy is 12.5% on the FTSE 100 (comprising Shell and BP). The S&P 500 has an approximate 5.2% exposure to oil and gas, though that’s almost double what it was two years ago, as a result of the ballooning valuations of the sector in tandem with the reverse happening with the tech leviathans that inhabit the upper regions of the S&P.
However, UK ethical funds also reflect this structural bias towards the sector. The average oil and gas exposure of Equity UK article 8 funds is 7.1%; article 9, 0.1%; and that of article 6, 10.5%. The sample size of UK-registered for sale article 9 funds is not large, which is understandable given this regulation isn’t UK applicable, although the average weightings do, nonetheless, look plausible. We’ve nevertheless got a reasonable sample size for article 8 funds. UK article 8 funds—“light green” vehicles which promote ESG characteristics—have an average UK oil and gas weighting that exceeds not just their European and US equivalents, but also of the article 6—none ESG—within these markets (see table).
Indeed, five Equity UK article 8 funds have a higher weighting to oil and gas than the FTSE 100, the highest having a 16.3% weighting to the sector.
Despite the persistent outflows experienced by UK equities, this oil and gas tilt has likely helped the market’s performance over the past year and more. Article 9 UK funds lag the performance of their article 8 peers, which in turn lag article 6. However, there’s a less than 0.4 correlation between Equity UK article 8, 12 month returns, and oil & gas portfolio exposure. OK, it’s a positive number, but pretty weak. After all, more than 60% of human DNA is identical to that of bananas, but we don’t look like these guys. It explains something but not everything—or even most things—in this instance.
There are many different flavours to ESG. In September, we looked at how the best-in-class approach was the probable driver behind sustainable Equity Global Income funds having a higher oil & gas exposure (and better 12-month performance) than their non-ESG peers. Another driver is that investors get a lower exposure to sin-stocks than the underlying market. It’s unclear as to how investors are viewing their ESG exposure—is it just a box to tick with little further due diligence being done? Is having a lower exposure to energy sufficient to tick said box? That may well be the case—for now at least. After all, the best-selling sustainable Equity UK fund over the past 12 months has an 13.8% exposure to oil and gas.
Table 1: Equity US, Europe ex UK and UK OIl & Gass Exposure, Performance
| Schemes Lipper Global | SFDR | ICB Industry 31/01/2022 to 31/01/2023 | ICB Industry 31/01/2020 to 31/01/2021 | % Growth 12 mths to 31/01/2023 | % Growth Three yrs to 31/01/2023 | % Growth Five yrs to 31/01/2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oil & Gas | Oil & Gas | Value | Value | Value | ||
| Equity Europe ex UK | 6 | 5.59 | 4.59 | 3.3 | 24.57 | 27.07 |
| Equity Europe ex UK | 8 | 6.13 | 4 | 3.35 | 26.18 | 32.01 |
| Equity Europe ex UK | 9 | 1.04 | 2.09 | -7.42 | 16.1 | 21.97 |
| Equity UK | 6 | 10.46 | 6.59 | 1.43 | 11.25 | 18.51 |
| Equity UK | 8 | 7.11 | 5.44 | -0.38 | 5.84 | 10.12 |
| Equity UK | 9 | 0.09 | 2.9 | -9.19 | -6.07 | 3.44 |
| Equity US | 6 | 6.1 | 2.94 | -0.99 | 34.04 | 65.77 |
| Equity US | 8 | 4.36 | 2.38 | -2.23 | 33.07 | 63.48 |
| Equity US | 9 | 1.54 | 3.63 | -2.54 | 38.02 | 71.77 |
Source: Refinitiv Lipper
Legal Disclaimer
Republication or redistribution of LSE Group content is prohibited without our prior written consent.
The content of this publication is for informational purposes only and has no legal effect, does not form part of any contract, does not, and does not seek to constitute advice of any nature and no reliance should be placed upon statements contained herein. Whilst reasonable efforts have been taken to ensure that the contents of this publication are accurate and reliable, LSE Group does not guarantee that this document is free from errors or omissions; therefore, you may not rely upon the content of this document under any circumstances and you should seek your own independent legal, investment, tax and other advice. Neither We nor our affiliates shall be liable for any errors, inaccuracies or delays in the publication or any other content, or for any actions taken by you in reliance thereon.
Copyright © 2023 London Stock Exchange Group. All rights reserved.
The content of this publication is provided by London Stock Exchange Group plc, its applicable group undertakings and/or its affiliates or licensors (the “LSE Group” or “We”) exclusively.
Neither We nor our affiliates guarantee the accuracy of or endorse the views or opinions given by any third party content provider, advertiser, sponsor or other user. We may link to, reference, or promote websites, applications and/or services from third parties. You agree that We are not responsible for, and do not control such non-LSE Group websites, applications or services.
The content of this publication is for informational purposes only. All information and data contained in this publication is obtained by LSE Group from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human and mechanical error as well as other factors, however, such information and data are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. You understand and agree that this publication does not, and does not seek to, constitute advice of any nature. You may not rely upon the content of this document under any circumstances and should seek your own independent legal, tax or investment advice or opinion regarding the suitability, value or profitability of any particular security, portfolio or investment strategy. Neither We nor our affiliates shall be liable for any errors, inaccuracies or delays in the publication or any other content, or for any actions taken by you in reliance thereon. You expressly agree that your use of the publication and its content is at your sole risk.
To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, LSE Group, expressly disclaims any representation or warranties, express or implied, including, without limitation, any representations or warranties of performance, merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, accuracy, completeness, reliability and non-infringement. LSE Group, its subsidiaries, its affiliates and their respective shareholders, directors, officers employees, agents, advertisers, content providers and licensors (collectively referred to as the “LSE Group Parties”) disclaim all responsibility for any loss, liability or damage of any kind resulting from or related to access, use or the unavailability of the publication (or any part of it); and none of the LSE Group Parties will be liable (jointly or severally) to you for any direct, indirect, consequential, special, incidental, punitive or exemplary damages, howsoever arising, even if any member of the LSE Group Parties are advised in advance of the possibility of such damages or could have foreseen any such damages arising or resulting from the use of, or inability to use, the information contained in the publication. For the avoidance of doubt, the LSE Group Parties shall have no liability for any losses, claims, demands, actions, proceedings, damages, costs or expenses arising out of, or in any way connected with, the information contained in this document.
LSE Group is the owner of various intellectual property rights ("IPR”), including but not limited to, numerous trademarks that are used to identify, advertise, and promote LSE Group products, services and activities. Nothing contained herein should be construed as granting any licence or right to use any of the trademarks or any other LSE Group IPR for any purpose whatsoever without the written permission or applicable licence terms.
