Kristen Mierzwa
- The FTSE Digi50 Index highlights that digital assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum exhibit liquidity levels exceeding many small-cap stocks.
- Crypto's 24/7 trading structure and diverse exchanges provide continuous liquidity, compared to the fixed trading hours of traditional equity markets.
- Institutional adoption could further boost crypto liquidity, with current levels already driven significantly by retail investors.
“Crypto isn’t liquid.” We beg to differ—this belief doesn’t reflect the reality of today’s digital asset market. While regulatory restrictions and custodial capabilities pose sizeable hurdles for broad-based digital asset products, liquidity is a (much) smaller concern. In fact, investors who think only Bitcoin and Ethereum are tradable at institutional levels might be surprised by the extent of liquidity in the digital asset marketplace.
Here we explore how liquidity in the evolving cryptocurrency market compares to the traditional US equity market.
Crypto liquidity boosted by continuous trading, dozens of centralised exchanges
The market structure for crypto is 24/7, which allows for continuous trading, whereas the US equity market is open during US trading hours. In both markets, advance trading infrastructure allows participants to adjust exposures around the clock via globally listed futures, options, perpetuals, and electronic communication networks.
Another noteworthy nuance in market infrastructure: Crypto assets trade on major centralised exchanges, decentralised exchanges, and over the counter via wallet-to-wallet transactions. At FTSE Russell, we consolidate volume from 43 centralised exchanges for the 400 assets we cover in our FTSE Digital Asset Universe.
US equities largely trade on the biggest US stock exchanges; however, there are dozens of exchanges that serve niche markets and many pools in which investors can source liquidity.
Greater institutional interest could bring additional liquidity
Even with the success of Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs, we have not seen the same institutional adoption of the crypto market as we have with other traditional asset classes. As such, it’s important to keep in mind that the liquidity we see today in crypto is primarily driven by retail investors—and less than what it could be if we see global institutional adoption of crypto.
Comparing liquidity of the FTSE Digi50 Index and the Russell 1000, 2000 Indices
We recently launched the FTSE Digi50 Index, which measures the performance of the top 50 digital assets by circulating weight, providing exposure to the digital asset market via liquid, globally recognised crypto assets. Below we compare the liquidity of the FTSE Digi50 Index to the US large cap Russell 1000 Index and the US small cap Russell 2000 Index for the month of October 2024. Please note these are pre-election results.
Data can be unreliable in digital assets, and liquidity data can include what are believed to be fake transactions. At FTSE Russell, we have put quantitative and qualitative measures in place to verify the asset and exchange data we use for our benchmarks and indices. Our calculation agent, Digital Asset Research, assesses the quality of market pricing data, qualifies pricing sources and vets more than 400 centralised exchanges.
For the purpose of this article, we have only used volume data from FTSE Russell Digital Asset Participating and Watchlist Exchanges. We have analysed the FTSE Digi50 Index constituents, whose assets have also been vetted through the methodology described above. The data is intended to represent executed transactions between real economic buyers and sellers. The liquidity data provided does not include wallet-to-wallet transactions or those from decentralised exchanges. The digital asset volume data amalgamates trades conducted in fiat currency directly, those conducted in digital dollar tokens like Tether and Circle, and those conducted in other cryptocurrencies.
Russell 2000 Index 1-Month ADTV (USDm) |
Russell 1000 Index 1-Month ADTV (USDm) |
Russell Top 50 Megacap Index 1-Month ADTV (USDm) |
FTSE Digi50 Index 1-Month ADTV (USDm) |
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Most Liquid Name | $740.93 | $32,718.03 | $32,718.03 | $9,934.44 |
Least Liquid Name | $0.01 | $0.51 | $585.45 | $2.72 |
25th Percentile | $1.73 | $58.22 | $859.11 | $9.46 |
50th Percentile | $6.14 | $119.92 | $1,099.31 | $19.40 |
75th Percentile | $17.74 | $257.53 | $1,792.58 | $61.05 |
Total Count | 1969 | 1009 | 51 | 50 |
Key observations:
- Marathon was the most liquid name in the Russell 2000 Index per one month, end of October average daily trading volume of $740 million. Marathon is a US-based digital asset technology company specialising in Bitcoin mining and cryptocurrency infrastructure.
- There were 405 names in the Russell 2000 Index that traded less than the least liquid name in the FTSE Digi50 Index.
- Half of the names in the FTSE Digi50 Index traded at least $10 million daily, which was more than half the names in the Russell 2000.
- Three names in the FTSE Digi50 Index traded more than $1 billion daily: Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana.
While our analysis shows the FTSE Digi50 Index was more liquid than US small-cap stocks during the month of observation, the overall crypto market—which is comprised of thousands of assets—is still less liquid than equities overall. Institutional interest, 24/7 accessibility, and increased market infrastructure could narrow the liquidity gap, though challenges remain, especially around regulation and market fragmentation.
FTSE Russell brought asset and exchange vetted pricing to market in 2021, followed by our flagship market cap index series in 2022. Our modular approach enables us to build customisable digital asset indices for regional regulatory and tradability needs.
Read more about
Disclaimer
© 2024 London Stock Exchange Group plc and its applicable group undertakings (“LSEG”). LSEG includes (1) FTSE International Limited (“FTSE”), (2) Frank Russell Company (“Russell”), (3) FTSE Global Debt Capital Markets Inc. and FTSE Global Debt Capital Markets Limited (together, “FTSE Canada”), (4) FTSE Fixed Income Europe Limited (“FTSE FI Europe”), (5) FTSE Fixed Income LLC (“FTSE FI”), (6) FTSE (Beijing) Consulting Limited (“WOFE”) (7) Refinitiv Benchmark Services (UK) Limited (“RBSL”), (8) Refinitiv Limited (“RL”) and (9) Beyond Ratings S.A.S. (“BR”). All rights reserved.
FTSE Russell® is a trading name of FTSE, Russell, FTSE Canada, FTSE FI, FTSE FI Europe, WOFE, RBSL, RL, and BR. “FTSE®”, “Russell®”, “FTSE Russell®”, “FTSE4Good®”, “ICB®”, “Refinitiv” , “Beyond Ratings®”, “WMR™” , “FR™” and all other trademarks and service marks used herein (whether registered or unregistered) are trademarks and/or service marks owned or licensed by the applicable member of LSEG or their respective licensors and are owned, or used under licence, by FTSE, Russell, FTSE Canada, FTSE FI, FTSE FI Europe, WOFE, RBSL, RL or BR. FTSE International Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority as a benchmark administrator. Refinitiv Benchmark Services (UK) Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority as a benchmark administrator.
All information is provided for information purposes only. All information and data contained in this publication is obtained by LSEG, from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human and mechanical inaccuracy as well as other factors, however, such information and data is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. No member of LSEG nor their respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors make any claim, prediction, warranty or representation whatsoever, expressly or impliedly, either as to the accuracy, timeliness, completeness, merchantability of any information or LSEG Products, or of results to be obtained from the use of LSEG products, including but not limited to indices, rates, data and analytics, or the fitness or suitability of the LSEG products for any particular purpose to which they might be put. The user of the information assumes the entire risk of any use it may make or permit to be made of the information.
No responsibility or liability can be accepted by any member of LSEG nor their respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors for (a) any loss or damage in whole or in part caused by, resulting from, or relating to any inaccuracy (negligent or otherwise) or other circumstance involved in procuring, collecting, compiling, interpreting, analysing, editing, transcribing, transmitting, communicating or delivering any such information or data or from use of this document or links to this document or (b) any direct, indirect, special, consequential or incidental damages whatsoever, even if any member of LSEG is advised in advance of the possibility of such damages, resulting from the use of, or inability to use, such information.
No member of LSEG nor their respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors provide investment advice and nothing in this document should be taken as constituting financial or investment advice. No member of LSEG nor their respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors make any representation regarding the advisability of investing in any asset or whether such investment creates any legal or compliance risks for the investor. A decision to invest in any such asset should not be made in reliance on any information herein. Indices and rates cannot be invested in directly. Inclusion of an asset in an index or rate is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold that asset nor confirmation that any particular investor may lawfully buy, sell or hold the asset or an index or rate containing the asset. The general information contained in this publication should not be acted upon without obtaining specific legal, tax, and investment advice from a licensed professional.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Charts and graphs are provided for illustrative purposes only. Index and/or rate returns shown may not represent the results of the actual trading of investable assets. Certain returns shown may reflect back-tested performance. All performance presented prior to the index or rate inception date is back-tested performance. Back-tested performance is not actual performance, but is hypothetical. The back-test calculations are based on the same methodology that was in effect when the index or rate was officially launched. However, back-tested data may reflect the application of the index or rate methodology with the benefit of hindsight, and the historic calculations of an index or rate may change from month to month based on revisions to the underlying economic data used in the calculation of the index or rate.
This document may contain forward-looking assessments. These are based upon a number of assumptions concerning future conditions that ultimately may prove to be inaccurate. Such forward-looking assessments are subject to risks and uncertainties and may be affected by various factors that may cause actual results to differ materially. No member of LSEG nor their licensors assume any duty to and do not undertake to update forward-looking assessments.
No part of this information may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission of the applicable member of LSEG. Use and distribution of LSEG data requires a licence from LSEG and/or its licensors.