Robin Marshall
Arguably one of the greatest frustrations for investors over the past year of rampant inflation was the dismal performance of real assets regarded as ‘inflation hedges’ – namely, inflation-linked bonds, real estate and gold – and their positive correlations to the returns of nominal assets, such as conventional government bonds.
Global asset returns (LC %) – Full year 2022
Negative duration effects at play for some hedges
Why did most inflation-protected real assets disappoint last year? For asset classes with fixed coupons, the most plausible explanation may be the sharp pickup in risk-free government bond yields as monetary tightening shifted into high gear. The resulting increase in discount rates on future cash flows applies to both real and nominal assets. For real asset classes such as inflation-linked government bonds, which differ only by maturity date and coupon, this effect is well-defined and quantifiable, and can overpower the favourable impact of higher inflation accruals.
Thus, inflation-linked bonds with longer maturities and duration suffered bigger losses than shorter-dated equivalents in 2022, particularly in the UK, reflecting the larger drag of higher discount rates on longer-dated cash flows. Most recently issued inflation-linked bonds have very low real coupons, so duration is skewed longer, increasing the sensitivity of total returns to changes in real yields.
Gold held up far better than other traditional inflation hedges in 2022, and relatively well overall, though much of this was the result of the investor flight from risk in the wake of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Since skyrocketing to a near-record high in early March, this non-yielding asset has faced stiff headwinds from the steady rise in nominal interest rates on cash and from the soaring US dollar, which make it more expensive for buyers of the precious metal in other currencies.
Timing disparities in inflation expectations
There may also be inflation-expectation timing effects at work. As illustrated below, short-run breakevens spiked globally in the inflationary aftermath of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the subsequent hard-line central bank response, while the rise in medium- and longer-dated breakevens was far more subdued. The flattening and, indeed, inversion of yield curves suggest investors expect these monetary tightening efforts will ultimately be successful, though not without recessionary consequences. The decline in the term premium on 10-year Treasuries is further evidence of this.
Global inflation breakevens (basis points)
A tough year for real estate as an inflation hedge
Even the returns of real assets with less homogenous underlying business fundamentals, such as commercial real estate, have struggled. Funding and other cost increases have generally outpaced those of rental incomes across property types over the past year, while pressures on occupancy and delinquency rates rose with the slowdown in economic growth. Rising interest rates have also dented the investment appeal of REITs, particularly relative to risk-free government bonds. REITs were hit hardest in the UK and Europe, where inflation has increased the most.
Regional FTSE EPRA NAREIT Index returns relative to local market (rebased, TR, USD)
Duration, or lease life, has also played a part in the divergences in relative REIT performances – both within and across regions. Lease agreements tend to run longer in Europe than in, say, Asia Pacific, leaving property incomes in Europe more vulnerable to the risks of rising inflation.
Unsurprisingly, REITs with long lease agreements with little or no inflation protection have ranked among the worst performers during previous bouts of higher inflation. They share many of the same characteristics of long duration, fixed coupon bonds. As with inflation-linked bonds, the inflation-protection in European lease agreements has proved insufficient to prevent a year of devastating losses.
Cost-push inflation also unfavourable for cyclical assets
The largely cost-push nature of this recent bout of inflation is another factor behind the underperformance of real assets. The current environment – in which rising reopening demand and severe supply/labour dislocations has driven up input costs while monetary tightening threatens economic stagnation – is hardly a welcoming one for cyclically sensitive assets like real estate.
Infrastructure bucks the trend
Given that infrastructure assets generally have inflation protection and are not subject to business cycles, it is not surprising they performed relatively well in 2022, despite their typically long durations. Core infrastructure assets, such as regulated utilities, tend to have floating-rate return characteristics, whereby cash flows rise as costs increase. Decarbonisation and the transition to renewable energy have also driven demand for listed infrastructure investments, as have their low correlations with other equity and credit sectors.
FTSE Core Infrastructure Index relative returns vs FTSE Global All Cap Index (rebased, TR, USD)
Inflation hedges that work best in low-inflation, low-rate environments
It is worth noting both real estate and inflation-linked government bonds have typically performed best during low-inflation, zero-interest-rate regimes such as in the immediate aftermath of the Global Financial Crisis and before the Covid-19 outbreak – despite their reputations as effective inflation hedges for all seasons. This suggests that the discount rate applied to future cash flows may be the dominant variable underpinning real asset valuations, barring times of outright price deflation. Meanwhile, the pullback in bond yields and US dollar since October has already helped bolster gold. These shifting dynamics pose important investment implications for real assets on any signs the current tightening cycle may be nearing a turning point.
For more details on recent performance trends across global asset classes, see our latest Performance Insights.
Disclaimer
© 2023 London Stock Exchange Group plc and its applicable group undertakings (the “LSE Group”). The LSE Group includes (1) FTSE International Limited (“FTSE”), (2) Frank Russell Company (“Russell”), (3) FTSE Global Debt Capital Markets Inc. and FTSE Global Debt Capital Markets Limited (together, “FTSE Canada”), (4) FTSE Fixed Income Europe Limited (“FTSE FI Europe”), (5) FTSE Fixed Income LLC (“FTSE FI”), (6) The Yield Book Inc (“YB”) and (7) Beyond Ratings S.A.S. (“BR”). All rights reserved.
FTSE Russell® is a trading name of FTSE, Russell, FTSE Canada, FTSE FI, FTSE FI Europe, YB and BR. “FTSE®”, “Russell®”, “FTSE Russell®”, “FTSE4Good®”, “ICB®”, “The Yield Book®”, “Beyond Ratings®” and all other trademarks and service marks used herein (whether registered or unregistered) are trademarks and/or service marks owned or licensed by the applicable member of the LSE Group or their respective licensors and are owned, or used under licence, by FTSE, Russell, FTSE Canada, FTSE FI, FTSE FI Europe, YB or BR. FTSE International Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority as a benchmark administrator.
All information is provided for information purposes only. All information and data contained in this publication is obtained by the LSE Group, from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human and mechanical error as well as other factors, however, such information and data is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. No member of the LSE Group nor their respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors make any claim, prediction, warranty or representation whatsoever, expressly or impliedly, either as to the accuracy, timeliness, completeness, merchantability of any information or of results to be obtained from the use of FTSE Russell products, including but not limited to indexes, data and analytics, or the fitness or suitability of the FTSE Russell products for any particular purpose to which they might be put. Any representation of historical data accessible through FTSE Russell products is provided for information purposes only and is not a reliable indicator of future performance.
No responsibility or liability can be accepted by any member of the LSE Group nor their respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors for (a) any loss or damage in whole or in part caused by, resulting from, or relating to any error (negligent or otherwise) or other circumstance involved in procuring, collecting, compiling, interpreting, analysing, editing, transcribing, transmitting, communicating or delivering any such information or data or from use of this document or links to this document or (b) any direct, indirect, special, consequential or incidental damages whatsoever, even if any member of the LSE Group is advised in advance of the possibility of such damages, resulting from the use of, or inability to use, such information.
No member of the LSE Group nor their respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors provide investment advice and nothing in this document should be taken as constituting financial or investment advice. No member of the LSE Group nor their respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors make any representation regarding the advisability of investing in any asset or whether such investment creates any legal or compliance risks for the investor. A decision to invest in any such asset should not be made in reliance on any information herein. Indexes cannot be invested in directly. Inclusion of an asset in an index is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold that asset nor confirmation that any particular investor may lawfully buy, sell or hold the asset or an index containing the asset. The general information contained in this publication should not be acted upon without obtaining specific legal, tax, and investment advice from a licensed professional.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Charts and graphs are provided for illustrative purposes only. Index returns shown may not represent the results of the actual trading of investable assets. Certain returns shown may reflect back-tested performance. All performance presented prior to the index inception date is back-tested performance. Back-tested performance is not actual performance, but is hypothetical. The back-test calculations are based on the same methodology that was in effect when the index was officially launched. However, back-tested data may reflect the application of the index methodology with the benefit of hindsight, and the historic calculations of an index may change from month to month based on revisions to the underlying economic data used in the calculation of the index.
This document may contain forward-looking assessments. These are based upon a number of assumptions concerning future conditions that ultimately may prove to be inaccurate. Such forward-looking assessments are subject to risks and uncertainties and may be affected by various factors that may cause actual results to differ materially. No member of the LSE Group nor their licensors assume any duty to and do not undertake to update forward-looking assessments.
No part of this information may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission of the applicable member of the LSE Group. Use and distribution of the LSE Group data requires a licence from FTSE, Russell, FTSE Canada, FTSE FI, FTSE FI Europe, YB, BR and/or their respective licensors.