FTSE Russell Insights

Unlocking the potential investment opportunities in China's local government bonds 

Lily Chung

Manager, Fixed Income and Multi-Asset Product Management and Research, APAC

Ian Chen

Associate, Fixed Income and Multi-Asset Product Management and Research, APAC

Local government bonds (LGBs) make up 28% of China’s bond market but account for less than 1% of foreign holdings due to liquidity and credit concerns.

The Chinese government is improving transparency and liquidity, introducing a debt restructuring initiative to enhance investor confidence in LGBs.

The FTSE BOC China Local Government Bond Index Series offers investors a structured benchmark to assess market performance and investment potential.

Foreign Investment in China's Bond Market 

Over recent years, China’s bond market has gradually been opening up, providing foreign investors with greater access to what is now the world’s second-largest bond market[1]. While foreign participation in the Chinese fixed income market has been growing, non-residents’ investments remain predominantly concentrated in certain bond types, such as Chinese government bonds (CGBs) and policy bank bonds[2]: approximately 60% of the offshore funds invested in Chinese bonds are allocated to these two categories, which are generally considered by international investors as safer, more liquid and easier to access than other Chinese fixed income sectors.

Offshore China Bond Fund Assets by Fund Type

chart displays Offshore China Bond Fund Assets by Fund Type

Source: LSEG Lipper. Data as of 28 February 2025. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Foreign investors’ holdings of onshore Chinese bonds reflect a similar pattern: as at January 2025, about half of these holdings were in CGBs, followed by 26% in negotiable certificates of deposit and 20% in policy bank bonds. 

In contrast, local government bonds (LGBs) currently account for less than 1% of total foreign holdings, despite the fact that LGBs represent the largest segment (28%) of China’s fixed income market in terms of outstanding value. The limited foreign investor demand for LGBs is driven by concerns over credit risk, liquidity and transparency, which continue to hinder broader international participation.

Foreign Holdings of Onshore Chinese Bonds by Bond Type

chart displays Foreign investors’ holdings of onshore Chinese bonds reflect a similar pattern: as at January 2025, about half of these holdings were in CGBs, followed by 26% in negotiable certificates of deposit and 20% in policy bank bonds.

Source: China Central Depository & Clearing and Shanghai Clearing House, FTSE Russell. Data as of 31 January 2025. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Share of Chinese Fixed Income Market by Bond Type

chart displays Share of Chinese Fixed Income Market by Bond Type

Source: LSEG Data & Analytics. FTSE Russell. Data as of 28 February 2025. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

From a credit risk perspective, LGBs are perceived to carry slightly more risk than CGBs and policy bank bonds. Some investors remain cautious about the fiscal health and repayment capacity of China’s local governments. Liquidity constraints are another factor, as LGBs’ market depth and trading volume have yet to match those of CGBs, making them less attractive to investors who require higher liquidity. Additionally, the lack of standardised investment tools poses a challenge: for example, there are fewer benchmarks for LGBs, making it difficult for investors to evaluate these bonds’ performance and to incorporate them into asset allocation models.

The challenges and opportunities of LGBs 

Market concerns regarding China’s local government debt largely stem from a slowing real estate sector, declining land revenues and challenges faced by local government financing vehicles (LGFVs). However, it is important to distinguish between LGBs and urban investment bonds issued by LGFVs, as they carry different levels of risk and government backing.

LGBs are issued directly by provincial and municipal governments, such as those in Jiangsu, Guangdong and Shandong, under central government oversight. These bonds represent explicit liabilities of local governments and are formally incorporated into both central and local government budgets, with annual issuance quotas approved by the National People’s congress. 

By contrast, urban investment bonds are issued by LGFVs at the provincial and municipal levels. As at end-February 2025, according to LSEG data, these bonds had an average option-adjusted spread (OAS) of 98 bps, significantly higher than the 20 bps for LGBs. While LGFVs often receive strong local government support, their debts are not considered direct government obligations. 

This distinction means that although LGFVs may have implicit backing, local governments are not legally required to repay their debts. As a result, LGBs have historically shown a stronger credit track record, with market concerns focusing more on the fiscal sustainability of certain regions rather than systemic credit risks.

table shows LGBs have historically shown a stronger credit track record, with market concerns focusing more on the fiscal sustainability of certain regions rather than systemic credit risks.
 Top 5 Issuers # of Bonds Par Amount* Market Value* Market Weight% Yield to Maturity Effective Duration OAS (bps)
Local Government Bond 1,271 21,049 22,872 100 1.95 8.98 20
  JIANGSU 114 2,339 2,528 11.05 1.92 8.18 19
  GUANGDONG 111 1,690 1,860 8.13 2 10.17 20
  SHANDONG 86 1,621 1,769 7.73 1.97 10.31 19
  ZHEJIANG 80 1,420 1,551 6.78 2 9.62 21
  SICHUAN 75 1,158 1,252 5.47 2 10.54 20
Top 5 Issuers 466 8,228 8,960 39.17 1.97 9.59 20

Source: FTSE Russell. Data as of 28 February 2025. Par amount and market value are in CNY billions. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

To reduce the uncertainties associated with local government finance and to enhance market confidence, the Chinese government has introduced a series of measures aimed at improving transparency and strengthening debt management.

Debt Restructuring Initiative: Since 2024, the central government has been implementing a multi-year debt restructuring initiative, known as the ‘Hidden Debt Swap Program’. Under this program, RMB 800 billion in new local government special bonds will be issued annually for five years, with a total of RMB 4 trillion earmarked to replace off-budget hidden debt held by LGFVs. Additionally, RMB 6 trillion in local government debt has been approved for restructuring, bringing liabilities under a more transparent fiscal framework. While these measures aim to alleviate financial pressure on local governments, their long-term effectiveness remains a key area of focus for the market.

Issuance Expansion and Liquidity Boost: China’s local government bond market has been expanding steadily. As of end of February 2025, the outstanding face value of LGBs reached RMB 48.1 trillion, accounting for 32.1% of the total onshore Chinese bond market, surpassing the RMB 34.9 trillion face value of Chinese government bonds and RMB 26 trillion of Chinese policy bank bonds. The annual issuance volume of LGBs has increased from RMB 7.4 trillion in 2022 to RMB 9.8 trillion in 2024, a rise of 32.4%. Increasing issuance volumes have also contributed to a more active secondary market and improved liquidity.

Annual Chinese Sovereign and Quasi-Government Bond Issuance 

charts shows The annual issuance volume of LGBs has increased from RMB 7.4 trillion in 2022 to RMB 9.8 trillion in 2024, a rise of 32.4%. Increasing issuance volumes have also contributed to a more active secondary market and improved liquidity.

Source: LSEG Data & Analytics. Data as of 31 December 2024. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Yield and Duration: On average, LGBs offer higher yields than CGBs, making them attractive to investors seeking enhanced returns. As of February 2025, the average yield on 10-year LGBs was 20-30 bps higher than that of comparable CGBs, primarily reflecting differences in credit risk and liquidity. LGBs also provide a longer duration (an average of 9 years, compared to 6.1 years for CGBs). This longer duration may address the investment needs of institutions such as life insurance firms and pension funds. For investors looking to optimise their Chinese fixed income exposure, LGBs therefore present an alternative worth considering. 

In summary, increasing issuance, policy support and an improving market infrastructure are gradually transforming the investment environment for LGBs. As a result, investors’ interest in this asset class is growing.

Performance Comparison: Chinese Sovereign and Quasi-Government Fixed Income Indices

charts shows In summary, increasing issuance, policy support and an improving market infrastructure are gradually transforming the investment environment for LGBs. As a result, investors’ interest in this asset class is growing.
table shows As of February 2025, the average yield on 10-year LGBs was 20-30 bps higher than that of comparable CGBs, primarily reflecting differences in credit risk and liquidity. LGBs also provide a longer duration (an average of 9 years, compared to 6.1 years for CGBs).
  Annualised Return Key Metrics
  1Y 3Y 5Y 8Y Yield to Maturity (%) Effective Duration (Yrs) OAS (bps)
Local Government Bond 6.82% 6.05% 5.05% 4.78% 1.95 8.99 20
Policy Bank Bond 4.94% 4.45% 4.13% 4.67% 1.8 4.65 20
Government Bond 5.67% 4.89% 4.11% 4.33% 1.64 6.09 -

Source: FTSE Russell. Data as of 28 February 2025. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

A New Benchmark: FTSE BOC China Local Government Bond Index Series

In view of the growing importance of LGBs in China’s bond market, there is an increasing need for standardised investment tools. To address this, FTSE Russell and Bank of China have introduced the FTSE BOC China Local Government Bond Index Series, providing a transparent and systematic benchmark to help institutional investors evaluate the market’s performance and risk/return characteristics. The key features of the index series include:

  • Comprehensive market coverage – The index series reflects the overall trends in China’s local government bond (LGBs) market, providing a reliable investment benchmark.
  • Attractive yield and risk profile – It offers a quasi-government fixed income allocation option in the Chinese market, but with a higher credit spread than CGBs.
  • Longer Duration – It provides an average duration of 9 years, compared to 6.1 years for CGBs and 4.7 years for policy bank bonds, making LGBs suitable for long-term investors such as life insurance and pension funds.
  • Enhanced liquidity – It serves as a benchmark for ETFs and active/passive funds, with a minimum amount outstanding of RMB 10 billion for individual issues. Coordination in index design between FTSE Russell and our partner Bank of China also supports improved liquidity conditions.
  • Diverse index offerings – The index series includes short-term, medium-term, long-term and composite indices, enabling investors to select the most suitable benchmark based on their investment objectives.

This index series provides market participants with a clear and measurable reference point, allowing institutional investors to incorporate LGBs into their portfolios more effectively.

Performance Comparison: Short-term, Medium-term, Long-term, and Composite FTSE BOC China Local Government Bond Indices

chart shows Performance Comparison: Short-term, Medium-term, Long-term, and Composite FTSE BOC China Local Government Bond Indices
  Annualised Return Key Metrics
  1Y 3Y 5Y 8Y Yield to Maturity (%) Effective Duration (Yrs) OAS (bps)
FTSE BOC Local Government Bond 6.82% 6.05% 5.05% 4.78% 1.95 8.99 20
FTSE BOC LGB 1-5Y 3.88% 3.42% 3.27% 3.63% 1.69 2.88 15
FTSE BOC LGB 5-10Y 6.63% 5.50% 4.72% 4.73% 1.89 6.65 19
FTSE BOC LGB 10Y+ 10.08% 9.79% 7.58% 6.92% 2.2 15.65 24

Source: FTSE Russell. Data as of 28 February 2025. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Conclusion

As China continues to enhance the transparency and marketability of the LGB sector, the investment environment for these bonds is evolving. Recent policy measures aim to address investors’ concerns over local governments’ fiscal management, improving the overall investability of LGBs.

With China’s bond market opening further, the potential for LGB investments continues to grow. The newly introduced FTSE BOC China Local Government Bond Index Series offers investors a comprehensive set of benchmarks for their LGB holdings, supporting the development of ETFs and fixed income funds centred around this expanding asset class. 

1. See China is now the second-largest FTSE WGBI market | LSEG

2. Policy bank bonds in China are issued by three main state-owned policy banks - the China Development Bank, the Agricultural Development Bank of China and the Export-Import Bank of China.

Read more about

Stay updated

Subscribe to an email recap from:

Disclaimer

© 2025 London Stock Exchange Group plc and its applicable group undertakings (“LSEG”). LSEG includes (1) FTSE International Limited (“FTSE”), (2) Frank Russell Company (“Russell”), (3) FTSE Global Debt Capital Markets Inc. and FTSE Global Debt Capital Markets Limited (together, “FTSE Canada”), (4) FTSE Fixed Income Europe Limited (“FTSE FI Europe”), (5) FTSE Fixed Income LLC (“FTSE FI”), (6) FTSE (Beijing) Consulting Limited (“WOFE”) (7) Refinitiv Benchmark Services (UK) Limited (“RBSL”), (8) Refinitiv Limited (“RL”) and (9) Beyond Ratings S.A.S. (“BR”). All rights reserved.

FTSE Russell® is a trading name of FTSE, Russell, FTSE Canada, FTSE FI, FTSE FI Europe, WOFE, RBSL, RL, and BR. “FTSE®”, “Russell®”, “FTSE Russell®”, “FTSE4Good®”, “ICB®”, “Refinitiv” , “Beyond Ratings®”, “WMR™” , “FR™” and all other trademarks and service marks used herein (whether registered or unregistered) are trademarks and/or service marks owned or licensed by the applicable member of LSEG or their respective licensors and are owned, or used under licence, by FTSE, Russell, FTSE Canada, FTSE FI, FTSE FI Europe, WOFE, RBSL, RL or BR. FTSE International Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority as a benchmark administrator. Refinitiv Benchmark Services (UK) Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority as a benchmark administrator.

All information is provided for information purposes only. All information and data contained in this publication is obtained by LSEG, from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human and mechanical inaccuracy as well as other factors, however, such information and data is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. No member of LSEG nor their respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors make any claim, prediction, warranty or representation whatsoever, expressly or impliedly, either as to the accuracy, timeliness, completeness, merchantability of any information or LSEG Products, or of results to be obtained from the use of LSEG products, including but not limited to indices, rates, data and analytics, or the fitness or suitability of the LSEG products for any particular purpose to which they might be put. The user of the information assumes the entire risk of any use it may make or permit to be made of the information.

No responsibility or liability can be accepted by any member of LSEG nor their respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors for (a) any loss or damage in whole or in part caused by, resulting from, or relating to any inaccuracy (negligent or otherwise) or other circumstance involved in procuring, collecting, compiling, interpreting, analysing, editing, transcribing, transmitting, communicating or delivering any such information or data or from use of this document or links to this document or (b) any direct, indirect, special, consequential or incidental damages whatsoever, even if any member of LSEG is advised in advance of the possibility of such damages, resulting from the use of, or inability to use, such information.

No member of LSEG nor their respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors provide investment advice and nothing in this document should be taken as constituting financial or investment advice. No member of LSEG nor their respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors make any representation regarding the advisability of investing in any asset or whether such investment creates any legal or compliance risks for the investor. A decision to invest in any such asset should not be made in reliance on any information herein. Indices and rates cannot be invested in directly. Inclusion of an asset in an index or rate is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold that asset nor confirmation that any particular investor may lawfully buy, sell or hold the asset or an index or rate containing the asset. The general information contained in this publication should not be acted upon without obtaining specific legal, tax, and investment advice from a licensed professional.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Charts and graphs are provided for illustrative purposes only. Index and/or rate returns shown may not represent the results of the actual trading of investable assets. Certain returns shown may reflect back-tested performance. All performance presented prior to the index or rate inception date is back-tested performance. Back-tested performance is not actual performance, but is hypothetical. The back-test calculations are based on the same methodology that was in effect when the index or rate was officially launched. However, back-tested data may reflect the application of the index or rate methodology with the benefit of hindsight, and the historic calculations of an index or rate may change from month to month based on revisions to the underlying economic data used in the calculation of the index or rate.

This document may contain forward-looking assessments. These are based upon a number of assumptions concerning future conditions that ultimately may prove to be inaccurate. Such forward-looking assessments are subject to risks and uncertainties and may be affected by various factors that may cause actual results to differ materially. No member of LSEG nor their licensors assume any duty to and do not undertake to update forward-looking assessments.

No part of this information may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission of the applicable member of LSEG. Use and distribution of LSEG data requires a licence from LSEG and/or its licensors.