![](/content/dam/ftse-russell/en_us/insights/images/photography/people/avatars/fr2817020-mark-barnes-300x3001.jpg.transform/sq-72/q90/image.jpg)
Mark Barnes, PhD,
![](/content/dam/ftse-russell/en_us/insights/images/photography/people/avatars/fr2817020-indhu-raghavan-300x300.jpg.transform/sq-72/q90/image.jpg)
Indhu Raghavan, CFA,
- In July, the Russell 2000 small-cap index outpaced Russell 1000 in a shift from their relative performance during the first half of 2024. This shift seems to be related to changes in the US monetary policy outlook.
- From July 2023 to April 2024, as the 10-year US Treasury yield rose, Russell 1000 outperformed Russell 2000, and vice versa. However, in May and June 2024 this pattern reversed. AI optimism and the focus on mega-cap tech earnings and prospects may have contributed to the tech heavy Russell 1000’s continued outperformance even as the long-term yield fell.
- In July, the small-cap index closed much of the relative underperformance from May and June and there was a general broadening of the equity rally.
- Whether the shift in Russell 2000’s relative performance will be sustained depends on the many drivers of returns and the continuation of the benign macro backdrop that has supported the US equity rally this year.
On July 11 and 16, the Russell 2000 small-cap index lurched 3.6% and 3.5%, respectively, its two largest single day moves of the year as of the time of writing (23 July 2024). It helped Russell 2000 outpace the Russell 1000 index thus far in July in a shift from their relative performance during the first half of 2024 as shown in Exhibit 1.
Exhibit 1: Russell 1000 and Russell 2000 total return (%)
Source: FTSE Russell and LSEG. Data as of 23 July 2024. Please see the end for important legal disclosures.
Exhibit 2 illustrates the dramatic nature of the July moves in the Russell large-cap and small-cap indices and their style cohorts. Month-to-date, leadership has shifted from large-caps to small-caps and from Growth to Value in both size segments.
Exhibit 2: Russell indices cumulative return, July 1-23, 2024 (rebased 30 June 2024, USD)
Source: FTSE Russell and LSEG. Data as of 23 July 2024. Please see the end for important legal disclosures.
These moves seem to be related to changes in expected US monetary policy.
On July 11, the June consumer price inflation (CPI) for the US was released and was lower than the May CPI. Coming on the back of two successive months of disinflation, it provided markets greater confidence in the Fed’s expected monetary easing trajectory.
On July 16, the June retail sales numbers were released, which were unchanged from May when expectations were for it to decline. As an indicator of the aggregate health of the US consumer, it provided markets one data point for expecting the benign growth picture to be sustained.
Over the last year, the Russell 2000 index has had two other similarly large daily moves as in July (Exhibit 3) that happened close to the release of lower CPI data. In each instance, the 10-year US Treasury yield declined on expectations of an end to the rate hiking cycle and prospects for monetary easing. Further, the associated move in Russell 2000 was larger than the move in Russell 1000. indicated on the chart.
Exhibit 3: The Russell 2000 index’s four largest daily total returns, July 2023 – July 2024
Date |
Russell 1000 (%) |
Russell 2000 (%) |
10-year yield change (bps) |
---|---|---|---|
16-Jul-24 |
0.8% |
3.5% |
-6.20 |
11-Jul-24 |
-0.7% |
3.6% |
-8.70 |
13-Dec-23 |
1.5% |
3.5% |
-17.30 |
14-Nov-23 |
2.1% |
5.5% |
-19.10 |
Source: FTSE Russell and LSEG. Data as of 23 July 2024. Please see the end for important legal disclosures.
Exhibit 4 illustrates the relationship between long-term interest rates, that have been top of mind for investors since the Fed began tightening policy rates, and the relative performance of Russell large-cap and small-cap indices over the last year. The table beneath the chart delineates this timeframe into five periods based (approximately) on the shifts in the trajectory of long-term interest rates. It shows the total returns and relative return for these indices along with the change in the 10-year US Treasury yield for each period that is also indicated on the chart.
Exhibit 4: Russell 1000 and Russell 2000 relative return (USD, LHS), 10-year US Treasury yield (%, RHS), July 2023 – July 2024.
Source: FTSE Russell and LSEG. Data as of 23 July 2024. Please see the end for important legal disclosures.
Period | Start | End | Russell 1000 (%) | Russell 2000 (%) | Russell 1000 - Russell 2000 (%) | 10-year yield change (bps) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 30-Jun-23 | 31-Oct-23 | -5.50% | -11.60% | 6.10% | 105.6 |
2 | 31-Oct-23 | 29-Dec-23 | 14.70% | 22.40% | -7.60% | -101.5 |
3 | 29-Dec-23 | 30-Apr-24 | 5.60% | -2.20% | 7.80% | 82.4 |
4 | 30-Apr-24 | 28-Jun-24 | 8.20% | 4.00% | 4.10% | -34.1 |
5 | 28-Jun-24 | 23-Jul-24 | 2.00% | 9.60% | -7.60% | -10.4 |
Source: FTSE Russell and LSEG. Data as of 23 July 2024. Please see the end for important legal disclosures.
From the end of June 2023 to the end of April 2024, covering the first three periods, as the 10-year Treasury yield rose, Russell 1000 outperformed Russell 2000, and as the long-term yield fell, the large-cap index underperformed the small-cap index. However, in May and June of this year (during the fourth period) we saw this pattern reverse. As long yields declined once again after the April market pullback, Russell 1000 continued to outperform Russell 2000 fueled by AI tailwinds and healthy earnings among mega-caps and tech companies in a much narrower equity rally than the one we saw earlier in the year, as we discussed in our quarterly Russell US Indexes Spotlight. In fact, a handful of Russell 1000 sectors such as tech hardware and software and electricity (in the Utilities industry) contributed the bulk of the large-cap index’s returns.
Further, at the end of June, the Russell 1000 index traded at historically high forward valuations. By contrast, despite the market beginning to price in lower rates, the Russell 2000 stayed downbeat in Q2. At the end of June, the small cap to large cap valuation premium was among the lowest 5% of observations over the last 20 years.
The other point to note about the July 2024 moves is that they did not just represent moves into the Russell 2000 at the expense of the Russell 1000. We compared the daily moves in the market-cap weighted Russell indices with the moves in their equal-weighted counterparts (Exhibit 5). Although Russell 1000 lost -0.7% on July 11 and gained only +0.8% on July 16, the equal-weighted Russell 1000 index rose by +1.7% and +1.8%, respectively, on those days. This suggests that there was a broadening of the rally even within the large cap Russell 1000 index.
Exhibit 5: Russell 1000 and Russell 2000, market-cap weighted and equal-weighted indices’ total return (%)
Date | Russell 1000 (%) | Russell 1000 equal-weighted (%) | Russell 2000 (%) | Russell 2000 equal-weighted (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
16-Jul-24 | 0.80% | 1.80% | 3.50% | 3.70% |
11-Jul-24 | -0.70% | 1.70% | 3.60% | 4.30% |
July 1-23 | 2.00% | 3.30% | 9.60% | 10.30% |
Source: FTSE Russell and LSEG. Data as of 23 July 2024. Please see the end for important legal disclosures.
Conclusion
The drivers of returns, such as interest rate expectations and AI tailwinds, that the market chooses to prioritize at any given point matter. AI optimism and the focus on mega-cap tech earnings and prospects may have contributed to the tech heavy Russell 1000’s continued outperformance of Russell 2000 during May and June when long interest rates fell, leading to a divergence in the relationship observed previously. In July, the small-cap index closed much of that relative underperformance. In addition, the stretched valuations among large-caps collectively may help to partly explain why when the market priced in another bout of good news on interest rates on July 11, the Russell 2000 index rallied more than its large-cap counterpart. In other words, the starting point for valuations matter.
Further, there was a broadening of the rally even within the Russell 1000 index, suggesting that the contrast in performance in July from earlier may not be strictly between large-caps and small-caps, but between the leaders of the US equity rally YTD and the rest.
The shift in relative performance in July between Russell 1000 and Russell 2000 was dramatic. Whether it will be sustained depends on the many drivers of returns and the continuation of the benign macro backdrop that has supported the US equity rally since the end of last year.
Disclaimer
© 2024 London Stock Exchange Group plc and its applicable group undertakings (“LSEG”). LSEG includes (1) FTSE International Limited (“FTSE”), (2) Frank Russell Company (“Russell”), (3) FTSE Global Debt Capital Markets Inc. and FTSE Global Debt Capital Markets Limited (together, “FTSE Canada”), (4) FTSE Fixed Income Europe Limited (“FTSE FI Europe”), (5) FTSE Fixed Income LLC (“FTSE FI”), (6) FTSE (Beijing) Consulting Limited (“WOFE”) (7) Refinitiv Benchmark Services (UK) Limited (“RBSL”), (8) Refinitiv Limited (“RL”) and (9) Beyond Ratings S.A.S. (“BR”). All rights reserved.
FTSE Russell® is a trading name of FTSE, Russell, FTSE Canada, FTSE FI, FTSE FI Europe, WOFE, RBSL, RL, and BR. “FTSE®”, “Russell®”, “FTSE Russell®”, “FTSE4Good®”, “ICB®”, “Refinitiv” , “Beyond Ratings®”, “WMR™” , “FR™” and all other trademarks and service marks used herein (whether registered or unregistered) are trademarks and/or service marks owned or licensed by the applicable member of LSEG or their respective licensors and are owned, or used under licence, by FTSE, Russell, FTSE Canada, FTSE FI, FTSE FI Europe, WOFE, RBSL, RL or BR. FTSE International Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority as a benchmark administrator. Refinitiv Benchmark Services (UK) Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority as a benchmark administrator.
All information is provided for information purposes only. All information and data contained in this publication is obtained by LSEG, from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human and mechanical inaccuracy as well as other factors, however, such information and data is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. No member of LSEG nor their respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors make any claim, prediction, warranty or representation whatsoever, expressly or impliedly, either as to the accuracy, timeliness, completeness, merchantability of any information or LSEG Products, or of results to be obtained from the use of LSEG products, including but not limited to indices, rates, data and analytics, or the fitness or suitability of the LSEG products for any particular purpose to which they might be put. The user of the information assumes the entire risk of any use it may make or permit to be made of the information.
No responsibility or liability can be accepted by any member of LSEG nor their respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors for (a) any loss or damage in whole or in part caused by, resulting from, or relating to any inaccuracy (negligent or otherwise) or other circumstance involved in procuring, collecting, compiling, interpreting, analysing, editing, transcribing, transmitting, communicating or delivering any such information or data or from use of this document or links to this document or (b) any direct, indirect, special, consequential or incidental damages whatsoever, even if any member of LSEG is advised in advance of the possibility of such damages, resulting from the use of, or inability to use, such information.
No member of LSEG nor their respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors provide investment advice and nothing in this document should be taken as constituting financial or investment advice. No member of LSEG nor their respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors make any representation regarding the advisability of investing in any asset or whether such investment creates any legal or compliance risks for the investor. A decision to invest in any such asset should not be made in reliance on any information herein. Indices and rates cannot be invested in directly. Inclusion of an asset in an index or rate is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold that asset nor confirmation that any particular investor may lawfully buy, sell or hold the asset or an index or rate containing the asset. The general information contained in this publication should not be acted upon without obtaining specific legal, tax, and investment advice from a licensed professional.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Charts and graphs are provided for illustrative purposes only. Index and/or rate returns shown may not represent the results of the actual trading of investable assets. Certain returns shown may reflect back-tested performance. All performance presented prior to the index or rate inception date is back-tested performance. Back-tested performance is not actual performance, but is hypothetical. The back-test calculations are based on the same methodology that was in effect when the index or rate was officially launched. However, back-tested data may reflect the application of the index or rate methodology with the benefit of hindsight, and the historic calculations of an index or rate may change from month to month based on revisions to the underlying economic data used in the calculation of the index or rate.
This document may contain forward-looking assessments. These are based upon a number of assumptions concerning future conditions that ultimately may prove to be inaccurate. Such forward-looking assessments are subject to risks and uncertainties and may be affected by various factors that may cause actual results to differ materially. No member of LSEG nor their licensors assume any duty to and do not undertake to update forward-looking assessments.
No part of this information may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission of the applicable member of LSEG. Use and distribution of LSEG data requires a licence from LSEG and/or its licensors.