Belle Chang
- Given Singapore’s high concentration in Financials and relatively low weight in Technology and Consumer Discretionary industries, the Straits Times Index can be seen as an alternative to diversify from expensive global Technology stocks.
- The Straits Times Index offers high dividend yields and low volatility. These can be attractive to investors seeking income or defensiveness as the world moves towards a rate cut cycle. From a longer-term perspective, demographic shifts to an aging population have raised demand for investment opportunities that offer lower volatility and higher dividends.
- On a valuation basis, the Straits Times Index is inexpensive relative to other APAC markets, while its ROE is relatively high, especially when compared with its ASEAN peers, many of which also have higher weights in Financials stocks.
The Straits Times Index (STI) is an increasingly important piece of the Asia Pacific equity market. In a previous article, Singapore’s growing financial and telecom industries, we tied the growing importance of the services industries, especially Financials, Telecom and Utilities, to the structure of Singapore’s economy and its patterns of GDP growth. In particular, the equity market of Singapore is highly concentrated in Financials, particularly Banks, with the weight of Financials in the STI increasing to more than 50% from 33% over the past 10 years. Financials stocks performed well over the past two years amid the rate hike cycle. In addition, AI beneficiary industries in Singapore including data centers and electricity have led the Telecommunications and Utilities industries to outperform their peers since 2Q24. Although the two industries only account for ~10% of the index weights, it is a rising area that excites investors.
In this article, we focus more directly on characteristics of the STI to highlight the various types of investment opportunities it provides. Singapore equity is concentrated in Financials and has a low weight in Technology, the valuation of which has been expensive across global markets. This allows STI investors to diversify their Technology exposure, which is higher in other APAC markets. Additionally, the Straits Times Index offers high dividend yields and low volatility compared to its APAC peers. For investors looking for income, Singapore’s high dividend yield can be an alternative source of yield as the world gradually moves into a rate cutting cycle. Lower volatility provides a defensiveness that is differentiating from the high volatility Tech industry. Aging demographic shifts also raise the demand for income investing, and for low volatility. From a valuation standpoint, the STI offers these characteristics inexpensively as it is trading at an attractive level compared to its history.
In the sections below, we discuss these characteristics of the Straits Times Index in more detail.
Diversification from expensive global Tech stocks
Because of its different industry composition, the Straits Times Index exhibits a moderate correlation with the broader APAC markets, particularly lower than markets that are more driven by external demand than domestic demand. The correlation of STI with FTSE Asia Pacific Index has decreased since 2021 (Exhibit 1).
Exhibit 1: 36m rolling correlation vs FTSE Asia Pacific Index (In USD terms)
One explanation of the moderate correlation is that the STI has lower weight in Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Basic Materials than other APAC markets (Exhibit 2). Technology has been buoyant due to the global AI up-cycle, while the performance of Consumer Discretionary (particularly Autos) and Basic Materials is more correlated to the economic growth cycle. Therefore, the correlation of STI with the FTSE Asia Pacific Index has fallen since 2021 when Technology (particularly the Technology Hardware and Equipment sector) began to benefit from work-from-home demand, which was then followed by a rise in AI-driven demand in 2023. During this period, the correlations of Taiwan and Japan to the FTSE Asia Pacific Index was relatively high.
Exhibit 2: Straits Times Index industry weights vs other FTSE Asia Pacific indices
One interesting pattern seen in Exhibit 1 is that the Indian and Chinese markets also exhibited a relatively low correlation with the broader APAC markets as well as global Technology stocks (Exhibit 3), even though these two markets have large Technology industries. There may be multiple reasons for this, including idiosyncratic shocks such as China’s weakness when re-opening after its covid shutdown. However, from an industry standpoint it is important to note that this was because the more expensive Technology stocks globally are predominantly in Tech Hardware and Equipment, which benefited directly from the ongoing AI up-cycle. However, the Technology stocks of India and China are more concentrated on Software and Computer Services.
Exhibit 3: 24m rolling correlation vs FTSE Global Technology SuperTheme Index (In USD terms)
Income: High Dividend Yield
When we compare various characteristics across APAC equity markets, one thing that stands out in the past one to two years is that Singapore’s dividend yields became the highest in APAC, surpassing Australia, which was on average the highest in APAC over the past decade. The dividend yield of the Straits Times Index rose above 5% level in 2023 (Exhibit 4).
Exhibit 4: Dividend yield of STI vs FTSE Asia Pacific Index
As we discussed in another article about Australia dividend yield (Australian equities – what is a lower dividend yield telling us?), elevated valuations and diminished earnings for Australian firms such as Basic Materials companies were the major reasons for Australia’s falling dividend yield. In the case of Singapore, the index has looked relatively cheap compared to both its past 10-year history range and its regional peers. At the same time, the dividend payout ratio (Exhibit 5) has been stable in the past two years and is around the same as its historical mean (past 10-year average: 46%).
Exhibit 5: STI dividend payout ratio
On an industry level, most industries’ dividend yields were larger than 4% – relatively high compared with the APAC average of 2.5%. The two largest market cap industries, Financials and Real Estate, paid dividend yields at 4.9% and 5.5%, respectively, as of November 2024 (Exhibit 6). Technology accounted for only 1.0% of the total index as of November 2024, while Financials and Real Estate accounted for 56.3% and 15.6%, respectively.
Exhibit 6: STI dividend yields by industry
Defensiveness: Low volatility and high dividend yield
The Straits Times Index also has a low volatility characteristic, mainly due to its high weight in Banks stocks and low weight in more volatile sectors like the Technology sectors. The STI became even less volatile in the past two years, and is now one of the APAC markets with the lowest volatility (Exhibit 7). With a high dividend yield, the low volatility characteristics can be especially attractive in a rate cut cycle when equity market volatility can rise amid various geopolitical risks and uncertainty around the global economic outlook. From a longer-term perspective, demographic shifts to an aging population have raised demand for investment opportunities that offer lower volatility and higher dividends. According to OECD [1], the elderly population in OECD countries grew from around 11.5% to almost 18% over the past 30 years.
Exhibit 7: 36m annualised volatility (monthly observations, in USD terms)
Attractively valued vs APAC peers
The valuation of Straits Times Index is relatively low compared to its APAC peers, and even more so compared to developed market peers. After recovering from the distortions of the Covid pandemic, the trailing P/E ratio is 13.0x as of November 2024, around the same level as the pre-pandemic average (Exhibit 8). One major characteristic of the Singapore market is a stable valuation – which is an important element for income investing strategies.
Exhibit 8: STI trailing P/E ratio
When compared to other APAC markets (Exhibit 9), the relatively low valuation can be attributed to its low weight in Technology and other growth stocks. Additionally, the growth outlook for DM markets is naturally less strong than high-growth emerging markets such as India and Indonesia.
Exhibit 9: STI vs FTSE Asia Pacific trailing P/E ratio
If we compare the valuation and return at the same time (Exhibit 10), the Straits Times Index also looks attractively valued. The valuation of STI is one of the lowest among the APAC markets, while the ROE is relatively high, especially when compared with its ASEAN peers, many of which also have relatively high industry weights in Financials.
Exhibit 10: P/B ratio and ROE of STI vs major FTSE All-World equity indices
Conclusion
The Straits Times Index offers an investment opportunity to diversify regional concentrations in Technology and conventional cyclical industries such as Basic Materials, Consumer Discretionary, and Industrials. Some industries, such as Technology, are relatively expensive and more heavily positioned among global investors. In addition, the index’s 5% high dividend yield and low volatility can be particularly attractive for income-focused investors amid a rate cut cycle and demographic shifts as a defensive investment option. Lastly, the Singaporean equity appears to be attractively valued compared to its own history and regional peers, particularly ASEAN peers.
[1] OECD (2024), "Elderly population" (indicator), https://doi.org/10.1787/8d805ea1-en (accessed on 19 November 2024).
Read more about
Disclaimer
© 2024 London Stock Exchange Group plc and its applicable group undertakings (“LSEG”). LSEG includes (1) FTSE International Limited (“FTSE”), (2) Frank Russell Company (“Russell”), (3) FTSE Global Debt Capital Markets Inc. and FTSE Global Debt Capital Markets Limited (together, “FTSE Canada”), (4) FTSE Fixed Income Europe Limited (“FTSE FI Europe”), (5) FTSE Fixed Income LLC (“FTSE FI”), (6) FTSE (Beijing) Consulting Limited (“WOFE”) (7) Refinitiv Benchmark Services (UK) Limited (“RBSL”), (8) Refinitiv Limited (“RL”) and (9) Beyond Ratings S.A.S. (“BR”). All rights reserved.
FTSE Russell® is a trading name of FTSE, Russell, FTSE Canada, FTSE FI, FTSE FI Europe, WOFE, RBSL, RL, and BR. “FTSE®”, “Russell®”, “FTSE Russell®”, “FTSE4Good®”, “ICB®”, “Refinitiv” , “Beyond Ratings®”, “WMR™” , “FR™” and all other trademarks and service marks used herein (whether registered or unregistered) are trademarks and/or service marks owned or licensed by the applicable member of LSEG or their respective licensors and are owned, or used under licence, by FTSE, Russell, FTSE Canada, FTSE FI, FTSE FI Europe, WOFE, RBSL, RL or BR. FTSE International Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority as a benchmark administrator. Refinitiv Benchmark Services (UK) Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority as a benchmark administrator.
All information is provided for information purposes only. All information and data contained in this publication is obtained by LSEG, from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human and mechanical inaccuracy as well as other factors, however, such information and data is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. No member of LSEG nor their respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors make any claim, prediction, warranty or representation whatsoever, expressly or impliedly, either as to the accuracy, timeliness, completeness, merchantability of any information or LSEG Products, or of results to be obtained from the use of LSEG products, including but not limited to indices, rates, data and analytics, or the fitness or suitability of the LSEG products for any particular purpose to which they might be put. The user of the information assumes the entire risk of any use it may make or permit to be made of the information.
No responsibility or liability can be accepted by any member of LSEG nor their respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors for (a) any loss or damage in whole or in part caused by, resulting from, or relating to any inaccuracy (negligent or otherwise) or other circumstance involved in procuring, collecting, compiling, interpreting, analysing, editing, transcribing, transmitting, communicating or delivering any such information or data or from use of this document or links to this document or (b) any direct, indirect, special, consequential or incidental damages whatsoever, even if any member of LSEG is advised in advance of the possibility of such damages, resulting from the use of, or inability to use, such information.
No member of LSEG nor their respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors provide investment advice and nothing in this document should be taken as constituting financial or investment advice. No member of LSEG nor their respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors make any representation regarding the advisability of investing in any asset or whether such investment creates any legal or compliance risks for the investor. A decision to invest in any such asset should not be made in reliance on any information herein. Indices and rates cannot be invested in directly. Inclusion of an asset in an index or rate is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold that asset nor confirmation that any particular investor may lawfully buy, sell or hold the asset or an index or rate containing the asset. The general information contained in this publication should not be acted upon without obtaining specific legal, tax, and investment advice from a licensed professional.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Charts and graphs are provided for illustrative purposes only. Index and/or rate returns shown may not represent the results of the actual trading of investable assets. Certain returns shown may reflect back-tested performance. All performance presented prior to the index or rate inception date is back-tested performance. Back-tested performance is not actual performance, but is hypothetical. The back-test calculations are based on the same methodology that was in effect when the index or rate was officially launched. However, back-tested data may reflect the application of the index or rate methodology with the benefit of hindsight, and the historic calculations of an index or rate may change from month to month based on revisions to the underlying economic data used in the calculation of the index or rate.
This document may contain forward-looking assessments. These are based upon a number of assumptions concerning future conditions that ultimately may prove to be inaccurate. Such forward-looking assessments are subject to risks and uncertainties and may be affected by various factors that may cause actual results to differ materially. No member of LSEG nor their licensors assume any duty to and do not undertake to update forward-looking assessments.
No part of this information may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission of the applicable member of LSEG. Use and distribution of LSEG data requires a licence from LSEG and/or its licensors.