
Qifei Zeng
LSEG’s latest research unpacks the Know Your Customer Enhanced Due Diligence (KYC EDD) space and examines AI as a potential solution to rising costs and complexity – with one important caveat.
Our latest research[1] report takes an in-depth look at the current and future KYC EDD landscape and explores five important findings, concluding that AI can solve many persistent challenges – but that the key ingredient to minimising risk is human oversight.
The evolving regulatory landscape governing KYC EDD requires companies to fully understand the risks posed by each customer. When heightened money-laundering/terrorist financing risks are present, standard customer due diligence alone is not enough. This is where EDD steps into the gap and delivers comprehensive insights that inform defensible onboarding and transaction decisions. It is crucial that KYC EDD processes are both efficient and effective – and that they deliver a frictionless customer experience.
Global AML regulations require companies to adopt a risk-based approach to fully understanding the potential money laundering and terrorist financing risks posed by any customer.
Real-world insights: what did we find?
Our report focusses on five key findings:
- EDD requests are rising
A significant 90% of respondents say that the volume of EDD requests has risen over the last three years, a factor that has contributed to rising costs, which must be balanced with the quality of due diligence and the need to make customer onboarding and transaction decisions quickly and seamlessly.
- KYC EDD budgets are expected to increase
Most respondents (87%) expect KYC EDD budgets to rise over the next 12 months, with an average expected crease of 5.2%. This is aligns with the rising volumes of EDD requests reported, and highlights that there is likely to be an increased focus on KYC EDD for many organisations into 2025 and beyond.
- Volume and cost top the list of concerns
When asked about their biggest challenges relating to KYC EDD reporting, high volumes of EDD requests (cited by 43%) and the associated high costs (cited by 42%) emerge as the most prominent concerns. Moreover, respondents revealed a range of other challenges, including pressure to make customer onboarding decisions quickly.
- Sanctions, data privacy and crypto transactions are on the radar
In terms of the biggest challenges respondents expect in the future, increased global sanctions and watchlists (cited by 49%), rising customer privacy and data protection laws (cited by 48%) and the expansion of digital currencies and crypto transactions (cited by 43%) emerge as key hurdles.
- “Human-centric” AI is favoured
When considering human-driven and automated solutions, 58% of respondents believe that KYC EDD should be mostly or fully human driven, and 42% believe it should be either fully or mostly AI-automated. This suggests that a human-centric, AI-enriched approach to KYC EDD is favoured.
The inherent risk in any new technology, including AI, underscores the value of human oversight, which mitigates AI risks such as hallucinations and bias. Trusted human expertise is invaluable to ensure that adequate checks and balances are in place.
Whilst at first glance AI appears to offer an immediate solution, our key finding is that a human-centric, but AI-enriched approach to KYC EDD is favoured.
As costs and volumes continue to rise and regulators continue to mandate meticulous due diligence, organisations find themselves needing to “do more with less” to maintain a defensible AML/KYC programmes. Harnessing the power of AI could hold the key to managing budgets, remaining compliant and retaining the quality of due diligence – but with one essential addition: a human-centric approach.
1. The research collated insights from 550 directors and other senior respondents across a range of countries – including the UK, Germany, UAE, France, Switzerland, USA, Canada, Australia, Singapore and Hong Kong – and included financial and non-financial businesses and professions, specifically drilling down to distil insights into current views on EDD spend and processes, as well as expectations for future developments.
Legal Disclaimer
Republication or redistribution of LSE Group content is prohibited without our prior written consent.
The content of this publication is for informational purposes only and has no legal effect, does not form part of any contract, does not, and does not seek to constitute advice of any nature and no reliance should be placed upon statements contained herein. Whilst reasonable efforts have been taken to ensure that the contents of this publication are accurate and reliable, LSE Group does not guarantee that this document is free from errors or omissions; therefore, you may not rely upon the content of this document under any circumstances and you should seek your own independent legal, investment, tax and other advice. Neither We nor our affiliates shall be liable for any errors, inaccuracies or delays in the publication or any other content, or for any actions taken by you in reliance thereon.
Copyright © 2024 London Stock Exchange Group. All rights reserved.
The content of this publication is provided by London Stock Exchange Group plc, its applicable group undertakings and/or its affiliates or licensors (the “LSE Group” or “We”) exclusively.
Neither We nor our affiliates guarantee the accuracy of or endorse the views or opinions given by any third party content provider, advertiser, sponsor or other user. We may link to, reference, or promote websites, applications and/or services from third parties. You agree that We are not responsible for, and do not control such non-LSE Group websites, applications or services.
The content of this publication is for informational purposes only. All information and data contained in this publication is obtained by LSE Group from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human and mechanical error as well as other factors, however, such information and data are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. You understand and agree that this publication does not, and does not seek to, constitute advice of any nature. You may not rely upon the content of this document under any circumstances and should seek your own independent legal, tax or investment advice or opinion regarding the suitability, value or profitability of any particular security, portfolio or investment strategy. Neither We nor our affiliates shall be liable for any errors, inaccuracies or delays in the publication or any other content, or for any actions taken by you in reliance thereon. You expressly agree that your use of the publication and its content is at your sole risk.
To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, LSE Group, expressly disclaims any representation or warranties, express or implied, including, without limitation, any representations or warranties of performance, merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, accuracy, completeness, reliability and non-infringement. LSE Group, its subsidiaries, its affiliates and their respective shareholders, directors, officers employees, agents, advertisers, content providers and licensors (collectively referred to as the “LSE Group Parties”) disclaim all responsibility for any loss, liability or damage of any kind resulting from or related to access, use or the unavailability of the publication (or any part of it); and none of the LSE Group Parties will be liable (jointly or severally) to you for any direct, indirect, consequential, special, incidental, punitive or exemplary damages, howsoever arising, even if any member of the LSE Group Parties are advised in advance of the possibility of such damages or could have foreseen any such damages arising or resulting from the use of, or inability to use, the information contained in the publication. For the avoidance of doubt, the LSE Group Parties shall have no liability for any losses, claims, demands, actions, proceedings, damages, costs or expenses arising out of, or in any way connected with, the information contained in this document.
LSE Group is the owner of various intellectual property rights ("IPR”), including but not limited to, numerous trademarks that are used to identify, advertise, and promote LSE Group products, services and activities. Nothing contained herein should be construed as granting any licence or right to use any of the trademarks or any other LSE Group IPR for any purpose whatsoever without the written permission or applicable licence terms.