Anu Kumar
- Ongoing digitalisation and rising financial crime levels, coupled with a strict regulatory environment, mean that organisations need to adopt a robust, holistic approach to risk management – and a core element of this revolves around identity verification.
- Rather than relying on individual signals to verify identities, combining multiple methods – including document, biometric and database checks – can help establish greater levels of trust.
- LSEG and Onfido are longstanding partners in the digital identity space; together, we deliver powerful, multi-faceted identity verification checks.
A new LSEG webinar features a whistle-stop tour of global trust frameworks, along with practical insights into identity verification workflows that combine multiple checks – and deliver a seamless customer experience.
LSEG’s new webinar series, Meet the Experts, features invited and in-house experts unpacking relevant risk management topics. Our third in the series features panellists from LSEG and Onfido, our trusted partner specialising in digital identity and low friction identity verification. In this webinar, our experts unpack the need to combine multiple types of identity verification methods – including biometrics, document and database checks – to confirm the legitimacy of identities and mitigate fraud.
The need for enhanced identity verification
Ongoing digitalisation and rising financial crime levels, coupled with a strict regulatory environment, mean that organisations need to adopt a robust, holistic approach to risk management – and a core element of this revolves around identity verification.
Daniel Flowe, Head of Digital Identity, LSEG Risk Intelligence, reminds us that, in today’s economy, digital channels are now the default channels that consumers choose to conduct most of their business. Alongside this ongoing digitalisation, financial crime is rising – and much of it is linked to identity fraud.
Deep fake fraud, in particular, is rising at exponential rates, as AI-enabled tools create deep fakes that are ever-more lifelike. This means that single-signal identity proofing is no longer adequate and enhanced identity verification that uses a combination of biometrics, documents and databases has become essential.
2023 saw a 3000% increase in the volume of deep fake fraud attempts.
Source: Onfido
Such enhanced verification cannot negatively impact the customer experience – users increasingly expect a digital first experience on par with those they may experience with, for example, Amazon or TikTok. When they are being onboarded by an entity that has regulatory obligations to verify identity, however, challenges begin to emerge: organisations must remain complaint with evolving regulations, maintain trust and brand confidence in their brands – and deliver a smooth and frictionless onboarding experience – and all of this at speed.
Key global trust frameworks
Our panellists go on to outline some key guidance and prescriptive frameworks and standards across the globe, citing NIST (the National Institute of Standards and Technology) in the US, and ETSI (the European Telecommunications Standards Institute) in the EU.
NIST is a voluntary framework that “helps businesses of all sizes better understand, manage, and reduce their cybersecurity risk and protect their networks and data”[1], while ETSI “provides the opportunities, resources and platforms to understand, shape, drive and collaborate on globally applicable standards.”[2]
Given the substantial thought and consideration that go into developing these guidelines, both are highly valuable resources for any organisation looking to fortify identity verification capabilities. Their relevance extends far beyond their primary audiences – for example, the NIST IAL2 guidelines are geared towards the public sector, but nonetheless present a robust framework for other industries and organisations to follow.
In addition, more stringent guidance is increasingly evident in several other countries and regions, as governments look to implement more risk averse approaches around identity verification. These frameworks have been designed to help build trust, which is the essential ingredient in a successful digital landscape.
Smooth identity verification workflows
Chris Cortes, Senior Product Manager, Trust and Fraud Signals, Onfido, emphasises that no one signal can solve the challenges that surround identity verification. Multiple layers of identity verification, on the other hand, can help to establish a high level of trust. This is important, since a digital entry point is often the first experience a customer has of your brand. If that customer enjoys a positive onboarding experience and trusts that their data is safe, this can cement their trust in your brand for the lifetime of the relationship.
LSEG Risk Intelligence and Onfido are now working together to deliver powerful, multi-faceted identity verification checks that ensure a safe, smooth customer experience. While LSEG specialises in database identity verification, Onfido brings expertise in multiple additional types of identity verification – such as biometrics, document checks and device intelligence – to the table. The partnership enables Onfido to create IDV workflows spanning multiple checks, including LSEG’s powerful database identity validation functionality.
It is essential that all these signals work in tandem to ensure two things: robust identity verification that is at a compliant, trust framework level, coupled with and a seamless user experience. Flowe elaborates, “We take the complexity and push it behind the scenes to keep the user experience smooth and streamlined.”
Looking ahead
Looking ahead, our panellists agree that it is crucial to ensure proactive identity verification throughout the customer lifecycle. This means knowing more about your customer on an ongoing basis and is a core element of a holistic approach to risk management.
In today’s world, we see identity-related crime rising…Onfido and LSEG in partnership can help you implement a workflow that combines multiple types of identity checks
Flowe concludes that, as digitalisation continues to re-shape all areas of our lives, it is vital that individuals are able to identify themselves online with the same level of assurance that existed in person 30 years ago, commenting, “it is essential that we keep trust levels high and take identity and other trust measures seriously.”
[1] Understanding the NIST cybersecurity framework
[2] ETSI
Legal Disclaimer
Republication or redistribution of LSE Group content is prohibited without our prior written consent.
The content of this publication is for informational purposes only and has no legal effect, does not form part of any contract, does not, and does not seek to constitute advice of any nature and no reliance should be placed upon statements contained herein. Whilst reasonable efforts have been taken to ensure that the contents of this publication are accurate and reliable, LSE Group does not guarantee that this document is free from errors or omissions; therefore, you may not rely upon the content of this document under any circumstances and you should seek your own independent legal, investment, tax and other advice. Neither We nor our affiliates shall be liable for any errors, inaccuracies or delays in the publication or any other content, or for any actions taken by you in reliance thereon.
Copyright © 2024 London Stock Exchange Group. All rights reserved.
The content of this publication is provided by London Stock Exchange Group plc, its applicable group undertakings and/or its affiliates or licensors (the “LSE Group” or “We”) exclusively.
Neither We nor our affiliates guarantee the accuracy of or endorse the views or opinions given by any third party content provider, advertiser, sponsor or other user. We may link to, reference, or promote websites, applications and/or services from third parties. You agree that We are not responsible for, and do not control such non-LSE Group websites, applications or services.
The content of this publication is for informational purposes only. All information and data contained in this publication is obtained by LSE Group from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human and mechanical error as well as other factors, however, such information and data are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. You understand and agree that this publication does not, and does not seek to, constitute advice of any nature. You may not rely upon the content of this document under any circumstances and should seek your own independent legal, tax or investment advice or opinion regarding the suitability, value or profitability of any particular security, portfolio or investment strategy. Neither We nor our affiliates shall be liable for any errors, inaccuracies or delays in the publication or any other content, or for any actions taken by you in reliance thereon. You expressly agree that your use of the publication and its content is at your sole risk.
To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, LSE Group, expressly disclaims any representation or warranties, express or implied, including, without limitation, any representations or warranties of performance, merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, accuracy, completeness, reliability and non-infringement. LSE Group, its subsidiaries, its affiliates and their respective shareholders, directors, officers employees, agents, advertisers, content providers and licensors (collectively referred to as the “LSE Group Parties”) disclaim all responsibility for any loss, liability or damage of any kind resulting from or related to access, use or the unavailability of the publication (or any part of it); and none of the LSE Group Parties will be liable (jointly or severally) to you for any direct, indirect, consequential, special, incidental, punitive or exemplary damages, howsoever arising, even if any member of the LSE Group Parties are advised in advance of the possibility of such damages or could have foreseen any such damages arising or resulting from the use of, or inability to use, the information contained in the publication. For the avoidance of doubt, the LSE Group Parties shall have no liability for any losses, claims, demands, actions, proceedings, damages, costs or expenses arising out of, or in any way connected with, the information contained in this document.
LSE Group is the owner of various intellectual property rights ("IPR”), including but not limited to, numerous trademarks that are used to identify, advertise, and promote LSE Group products, services and activities. Nothing contained herein should be construed as granting any licence or right to use any of the trademarks or any other LSE Group IPR for any purpose whatsoever without the written permission or applicable licence terms.