Sandeep Bhide
Third parties can introduce substantial risk into global supply networks, but rigorous vendor risk assessments can be costly and time-consuming to complete. By adopting a data-first approach, you can simplify and optimize your vendor onboarding, without compromising the quality of risk screening and due diligence.
- Find out how ProcessUnity and LSEG work together to deliver trusted data for vendor assessment purposes and help simplify the process of conducting due diligence of vendors during onboarding.
- Learn how adopting a data-first approach can help you simplify and optimise your vendor onboarding, without compromising the quality of risk screening and due diligence.
The changing environment around vendor risk assessment
Against a backdrop of rising fraud, bribery, corruption and other forms of financial crime, corporate organisations are acutely aware of the potential risk that third parties can introduce into global supply networks.
A strict regulatory environment, combined with the threat of potential reputational damage if responsible business practices are not ensured throughout third-party networks means that robust third-party risk assessments combined with screening and monitoring are critical for organisational success.
Furthermore, risk professionals are increasingly aware of the need to conduct multi-faceted risk assessments investigating a range of potential risks. For example, it is no longer enough to assess information security or cyber risk alone. Organisations need to fully assess, monitor and manage a range of potential third-party risks, including environmental, social and governance (ESG), integrity, identity, operational, financial, reputational risks, and more. Companies are increasingly expected to adopt a sophisticated risk-based approach to compliance because of the strict-liability nature of most sanctions’ regimes. The risks associated with sanctioned entities and individuals are often hidden due to complex supply chain networks and ownership structures. In a backdrop of geopolitical tensions, it is paramount for organisations to have access to trusted, accurate and comprehensive screening data, a key pillar of a robust compliance program.
When assessing vendor risk, this need for a multi-faceted approach translates into lengthier, more complicated onboarding processes, usually including detailed questionnaires, which can create vendor and analyst fatigue and place undue pressure on often scarce resources.
The challenge of collecting the right data
Screening has a pivotal role to play in all aspects of third-party risk management (TPRM). The right screening datasets can help risk and compliance teams build a holistic picture of potential risk, more easily identify relationships where heightened risk may be present, spot trends, pinpoint concerns, and more.
That said, collecting the data directly from your third parties is not always a straightforward task. This can impact the veracity of the entire risk assessment process, because without complete and trusted data, effective risk assessment is impossible.
Looking specifically at risk assessments in the vendor onboarding space, gathering robust and complete data for each vendor can quickly become a substantial challenge. Vendor provided data may not be objective, in part because vendors may not provide an accurate or complete picture of their risk profile. Responses can also be incomplete if vendors simply don’t respond to requests for information at all. Repeated requests for information can become time-consuming, costly and slow the pace of business – but, more than this, they can create negative experiences that damage key vendor relationships.
Reducing your risk assessment burden
ProcessUnity has partnered with LSEG’s flagship risk intelligence database World-Check to address these data and scalability challenges and deliver a solution that reduces the vendor assessment burden by adopting a data-first approach. This allows customers to screen third parties and their beneficial owners (individuals and organizations) against the World-Check database and use the Media Check screening tool to further support their due diligence needs in the fight against financial crime, bribery, and corruption. The data provided simplifies compliance with regulatory obligations relating to anti-bribery anti-corruption (ABAC), enabling detailed screening and monitoring of politically exposed persons (PEPs) and heightened risk individuals and entities.
Our combined capabilities deliver trusted data for vendor assessment purposes and simplify the process of conducting due diligence of vendors during onboarding. In this way we help to empower TPRM teams to complete vendor assessments faster and gain greater coverage across their vendor portfolio. ProcessUnity also uses data from additional sources including the Global Risk Exchange and flags the potential discrepancies in vendor responses for you, so teams spend less time chasing and validating vendor identity and ultimate beneficial ownership (UBO) data.
It’s worth noting that data can be incorporated into a variety of TPRM use-cases, including procurement due diligence (determining which vendors to contract from a shortlist), onboarding, ongoing monitoring, and more. ProcessUnity offers a variety of complete, proven third-party risk program workflows developed to facilitate ongoing monitoring needs throughout the entire vendor lifecycle, and integrates with World-Check screening to help customers mitigate risk and continuously assess vendors more efficiently. Companies using the combined offering can support bribery and corruption risk management as a part of their TPRM program.
When assessments run smoothly, questions aren’t duplicated, and vendors aren’t repeatedly asked the same questions they’ve already answered. Additionally, teams can ensure a happy, stable vendor relationship, and mitigate the potential inheritance of third-party risk in the process.
This partnership is just one example of using a data-first approach, supplemented by leading technology, to simplify risk management in an environment that is increasingly complex and demanding – and to remain on the right side of an evolving regulatory risk curve without slowing the pace of business.
Read more about
Legal Disclaimer
Republication or redistribution of LSE Group content is prohibited without our prior written consent.
The content of this publication is for informational purposes only and has no legal effect, does not form part of any contract, does not, and does not seek to constitute advice of any nature and no reliance should be placed upon statements contained herein. Whilst reasonable efforts have been taken to ensure that the contents of this publication are accurate and reliable, LSE Group does not guarantee that this document is free from errors or omissions; therefore, you may not rely upon the content of this document under any circumstances and you should seek your own independent legal, investment, tax and other advice. Neither We nor our affiliates shall be liable for any errors, inaccuracies or delays in the publication or any other content, or for any actions taken by you in reliance thereon.
Copyright © 2024 London Stock Exchange Group. All rights reserved.
The content of this publication is provided by London Stock Exchange Group plc, its applicable group undertakings and/or its affiliates or licensors (the “LSE Group” or “We”) exclusively.
Neither We nor our affiliates guarantee the accuracy of or endorse the views or opinions given by any third party content provider, advertiser, sponsor or other user. We may link to, reference, or promote websites, applications and/or services from third parties. You agree that We are not responsible for, and do not control such non-LSE Group websites, applications or services.
The content of this publication is for informational purposes only. All information and data contained in this publication is obtained by LSE Group from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human and mechanical error as well as other factors, however, such information and data are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. You understand and agree that this publication does not, and does not seek to, constitute advice of any nature. You may not rely upon the content of this document under any circumstances and should seek your own independent legal, tax or investment advice or opinion regarding the suitability, value or profitability of any particular security, portfolio or investment strategy. Neither We nor our affiliates shall be liable for any errors, inaccuracies or delays in the publication or any other content, or for any actions taken by you in reliance thereon. You expressly agree that your use of the publication and its content is at your sole risk.
To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, LSE Group, expressly disclaims any representation or warranties, express or implied, including, without limitation, any representations or warranties of performance, merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, accuracy, completeness, reliability and non-infringement. LSE Group, its subsidiaries, its affiliates and their respective shareholders, directors, officers employees, agents, advertisers, content providers and licensors (collectively referred to as the “LSE Group Parties”) disclaim all responsibility for any loss, liability or damage of any kind resulting from or related to access, use or the unavailability of the publication (or any part of it); and none of the LSE Group Parties will be liable (jointly or severally) to you for any direct, indirect, consequential, special, incidental, punitive or exemplary damages, howsoever arising, even if any member of the LSE Group Parties are advised in advance of the possibility of such damages or could have foreseen any such damages arising or resulting from the use of, or inability to use, the information contained in the publication. For the avoidance of doubt, the LSE Group Parties shall have no liability for any losses, claims, demands, actions, proceedings, damages, costs or expenses arising out of, or in any way connected with, the information contained in this document.
LSE Group is the owner of various intellectual property rights ("IPR”), including but not limited to, numerous trademarks that are used to identify, advertise, and promote LSE Group products, services and activities. Nothing contained herein should be construed as granting any licence or right to use any of the trademarks or any other LSE Group IPR for any purpose whatsoever without the written permission or applicable licence terms.
