Overview
The Clearing House needs to provide robust and prudent risk management in order to meet its overriding objective: to provide Clearing Members with a central counterparty of the highest quality and to safeguard the interests of the company's shareholders and contributors to its Default Funds.
For SA specific information select from the links on this page.
For Group risk management information, including an overview of LCH risk mitigation approach, default waterfall structure and history of default management, select the Group tab.
Risk governance and framework
Risk governance
Matters concerning significant risks faced by the Group's CCPs are addressed by a Risk Committee appointed by the relevant subsidiary Board.
Chaired by an Independent Non-Executive Director (INED), membership of the Risk Committee is comprised of representatives of the CCP's users and their clients, and other INEDs. Further representatives from each CCP's user community and senior CCP executives attend the meetings as risk experts in a non-voting capacity.
Where appropriate, The Risk Committee Chair and the Board are advised by the Chair of the Board Operational Resilience Committee (ORC). Chaired by an Independent Non-Executive Director, the ORC is tasked with ensuring that technology, security and operational resilience strategies, investments and outcomes support LCH’s mission, values, and strategic goals.
Internally, an Executive Risk Committee (ERCo) reports to the LCH SA Board Risk Committee and the Local Management Committee (LMC). Chaired by the Chief Risk Officer (CRO), membership of the ERCo comprises heads of each clearing business as well as senior risk management and compliance executives.
Sub-Committees and Working Groups consider all risk matters prior to presentation to the ERCo.
Risk classification
The LCH Risk Governance Framework identifies and establishes the Board's appetite/tolerance for the following risk classifications under the remit of the Risk Management department.
| Financial & Model Risks | Operational Resilience Risks | Strategic Risks | People & Culture Risks | Legal, Regulatory & Compliance Risks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Default Management Risk | Technology Risk | Business Risk | Risk Culture | Legal Risk |
| Latent Market Risk | Business Continuity Management Risk | Transformation Risk | People & Talent | Regulatory & Compliance Risk |
| Procyclicality Risk | Information Security & Cyber Risk | Reputational Risk | Conduct Risk | |
| Credit Risk | Physical Security Risk | Sustainability (ESG) Risk | Oversight & Governance Risks | |
| Investment & Liquidity Risks | Third Party Risk | Geopolitical Risk | Financial Crime | |
| Settlement, Payment & Custody Risks | Data Risk | Tax Strategy | Fraud Risk | |
| Model Risk | Operational Process Risk | Financial Reporting & Tax | ||
| Capital Risk | ||||
| Pension Risk | ||||
| Insurance Risk |
Management of the Financial & Model and Operational Resilience risks identified above is effected through a set of risk policies maintained by the Risk Management department. All other risks are managed by specific business functions.
Each risk policy defines how the high level principles and standards contained in the Risk Governance Framework and relevant regulation are applied, and is supported by detailed annexes and procedural documentation which demonstrate how policy requirements are met.
All risk policies are subject to at least annual review by internal risk management committees and the Board Risk Committee, and require Board approval.
Margining methodology
Initial margin for all services is calibrated to be sufficient to offset any losses under normal market conditions incurred during the close-out period of a Clearing Member default, to a 99.7% confidence level. The percentage applied is agreed by the LCH Board and set out in the LCH Risk Governance Framework which is shared with the competent authorities.
Additional margins are levied to cover position concentrations, wrong way risk, illiquid positions and Clearing Members with lower credit standing or capital support.
Margins are back-tested daily for each Clearing Member and sub account against this confidence level, and reported monthly at clearing service level to regulators and at least quarterly to the Risk Committee. Service level margin back-testing results are included in the quarterly quantitative disclosures available in the Resources section of this website.
Please refer to the following section on margin models and their governance for further information.
Margin models & governance
Model inventory
An up-to-date inventory of all models is maintained. All models are reviewed by an independent model validation team annually. Material changes and all new models are also subject to an independent validation.
The inventory and validation status are reviewed annually by the Board.
Model performance is assessed daily through portfolio back-testing.
The margin models applied to each service are identified in the section below.
Margin models
| Market | Model Type | Margin Method Used | Minimum Look-back Period | Holding Period | Frequency of Parameter Review |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDSClear | Analytical | VAR / Expected Shortfall | Since April 2007 | 5 days | Monthly |
| RepoClear SA | Analytical | VAR (Sovereigns) SPAN®-like (€GCPlus other bonds) | 10 years | 5 days (Sovereigns) 7 days (€GCPlus other bonds) | Monthly |
| Cash Securities | Analytical | VAR / Expected Shortfall | 10 years | 3 days | Monthly |
| Derivatives | Empirical | SPAN® derivatives for Options and Futures | 1 year | 2 days | Quarterly |
Default funds and stress testing
Mutualised Default Funds are calibrated monthly and tested daily to be sufficient to withstand the default of the two Clearing Members giving rise to the largest losses calculated under scenarios of extreme conditions. Default Funds have a floor and a cap to ensure minimum levels of protection and avoid over-mutualisation.
Clearing Member contributions are subject to a minimum amount and re-calibrated monthly in proportion to the risk they introduce.
A proportion of CCP capital is placed ahead of non-defaulting Clearing Member contributions in the waterfall.
Clearing Members with large stress losses over margin are charged additional margins where the cap would otherwise be exceeded and intra-month if credit related tolerances are reached.
Analysis of stress testing and Default Fund adequacy is reviewed by the Risk Committee at least quarterly.
Stress test data is designed to answer two key questions:
- How safe are my margins, and by extension, my default fund contribution?
- What is the maximum assessment that I could be asked to provide, and in what circumstances?
Collateral risk
Cash and securities eligible to cover margin liabilities are restricted to those with low credit, liquidity, and market risks. Default Fund contributions can only be made in cash in the primary currencies designated by each clearing service, or, for certain markets, Central Bank guarantees.
Haircuts are applied to securities to cover market, credit, concentration/liquidity, wrong way and foreign exchange risks, calculated to a 99.7% confidence level over a 3 day horizon based on a 10 year look-back period.
The types of collateral currently acceptable, their haircuts and other conditions can be viewed by selecting the following link:
LCH SA has a right of use of margin or Default Fund contributions collected within the meaning of Article 2(1)(c) of Directive 2002/47/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 June 2002 on financial collateral arrangements, and therefore provides for such right in its operating rules.
Default management
LCH CCPs have detailed default management plans and procedures consistent with the Default Management Policy.
These provide clear criteria for when to call a Clearing Member into default and the steps to be followed in order to manage such a default event.
The policy also requires frequent default management testing or ‘fire drills', at both product and cross product levels.
The CCP Rulebooks outline the relationship between LCH and Clearing Members, covering the rights and obligations of each during a Clearing Member default.
Credit risk and membership
LCH Group CCPs review the counterparty risk of Clearing Members and other counterparties including sovereigns by continually monitoring market indicators and financial information.
An Internal Credit Scoring (ICS) framework assesses the entity’s:
Financial Profile, including:
- Asset quality
- Capital adequacy
- Funding & liquidity; and
- Profitability
Operational Capability, including:
- External support (if applicable)
- Operating environment
- Operational profile; and
- Risk management policies & procedures
- Support and sovereign ceiling considerations
The rating model is validated at least annually and the rating scale is continuously monitored for performance.
A minimum credit score is set for joining a clearing service and the same entry requirement is applied to existing Clearing Members wishing to join another service within LCH. Increased margins are applied when the credit score deteriorates below the entry level. Other actions may include reduced credit tolerances and forced reduction of exposures.
Access more detailed information on membership, including entry criteria, the application process and current membership, for each of the Group CCPs.
Membership and client risk disclosure
The key risk connected with being a Clearing Member (or client of a Clearing Member) of any LCH clearing service will be a risk of financial loss. Some of the associated risk scenarios are described below:
- Clearing Member default –non-defaulting Clearing Members are at risk of losing Default Fund contributions and further Default Fund assessments. Each service also has a process to allocate further losses to Clearing Members of that service. In the event of service closure, replacement costs could be incurred. Clients of a defaulting Clearing Member may also incur losses or disruption to their activities as a result of the default management process. For further information please refer to the following rules in respect of the:
Cash/Derivatives/ Fixed Income/ Triparty Repo segments:
- LCH SA Clearing Rule Book : Title IV – Chapters 3 and 5 and Section 5.3.2
- Instruction IV.5-2 (all segments)
- Instructions IV.3-1 and IV.5-5 (Cash and Derivatives)
- Instructions IV.3-2 and IV.5-3 and IV.55-4 a, (Fixed Income)
- Instructions IV.5-4 a, V.4-2 and V.4-3 (Triparty Repo)
CDSClear segment:
- LCH SA CDS Clearing Rule Book: Section 3.1.9 and Title IV, Chapters 3 and 4
- CDS Default Management Process attached as Appendix 1 to the LCH SA CDS Clearing Rule Book.
Default (insolvency) of LCH – For information on the applicable rules please refer to:
- Cash/Derivatives/Fixed Income/ Triparty Repo segments:
- LCH SA Clearing Rule Book: Title I – Chapter 4
- CDS Clearing segment:
- LCH SA CDS Clearing Rule Book: Title I – Chapter 3
In the event of market disorder, impossibility of performance, trade emergency or in cases of force majeure, the LCH SA Cash /Derivatives /Fixed Income /Triparty Repo Clearing Rule Book and the LCH SA CDS Clearing Rule Book (Section 1.2.11), as the case may be, may apply and Clearing Members could suffer losses as a result of actions taken by LCH.
Disclaimer: The above description is a summary of the key financial risks to which Clearing Members of LCH and/or their clients may be exposed. This list is not exhaustive and Clearing Members and their clients should review the applicable clearing rules, as amended from time to time, and carry out their own risk analysis.
Useful Links
Investment Risk
Investment risk arises through the investment of Clearing Member cash posted as collateral for margin liabilities and Default Fund contributions. Investments are made in such a way as to ensure that principal is protected and liquidity is available when needed, even under stressed conditions.
To deal with this:
- All investment counterparties meet minimum credit standards according to an internal credit assessment
- All investments meet minimum credit criteria, and must be explicitly Government guaranteed
- The average term of the investment portfolio is consistent with regulatory standards
- Unsecured investments are limited to <5% of total lending to commercial banks and must be no longer than overnight in term