Ellen Ó Fríl
- India’s fast-growing economy is attracting positive interest from overseas investors, translating into a rise in net inflows of foreign direct investment
- India is well-placed to benefit if Western companies feel it prudent to diversify their supply chains away from China
- The question remains whether India is poised or even capable of seizing the opportunities presented?
A “huge opportunity” is how Apple CEO Tim Cook described India, after meeting the country’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi at the White House last year[1]. It was more than empty praise. Apple and numerous other tech companies have increased their investment in India in recent years.
It comes as no secret that Prime Minister Modi would like India to rival or even replace China as a powerhouse in the global market, spanning manufacturing to financial investment, positioning the country as a key driver of the global economy.
Such a prospect is a long way off, though recent developments have been promising. Hefty net inflows of foreign money have helped to create China’s economic miracle; while today, a combative China looks less attractive a place for investment, with further international capital diverted to India. Data from the World Bank show that FDI inflows into India have risen to levels similar to the FDI flowing into China, as a proportion of domestic GDP.
Chart 1: Foreign direct investment
China’s GDP is of course still much larger than India’s; but India’s pace of GDP growth is now outstripping China’s. Tim Cook cited India’s fast-growing economy and its “very large, young and tech-savvy population” as key reasons to be enthused about the country. This tech savvy is reflected in another factor that foreign investors find attractive: India’s relative specialism in IT services. As chart 2 shows, these consistently account for almost half its total service exports — far higher than other countries that have recently succeeded in graduating to high income status as defined by the World Bank. In China, IT service exports only exceeded 10% for the first time in 2015.
Chart 2: IT service exports
Of course, although a globally competitive services sector offers scope for high-pay, high-productivity employment, India remains a low-middle income country and it is unlikely that IT services will be sufficient on their own to drive its economic development. The IT sector is not labour-intensive, and some of India’s comparative specialisms appear vulnerable to automation and AI.
Nonetheless, Fathom analysis of timely LSEG data, accessed via Eikon, suggest things may be changing. In 2022, foreign acquisitions of Indian-owned firms made up 3.7% of global M&A activity by number of deals, compared to 2.2% for Chinese-owned firms – with a growing number in the computers and electronics sector. This is the first time India has outperformed China on this measure since our analysis began. Some may argue that this reflected the zero-COVID policy that Beijing was implementing at the time, but recent trends from 2023 do not suggest a reversal. Instead, they offer strong evidence of global confidence in India’s outlook. To some extent this confidence could become self-fulfilling, as the acquiror transfers knowledge and money to its new subsidiaries, raising productivity as a result.
Chart 3: Acquisitions of India- and China-owned firms
If India’s economic growth continues to outpace the global average its share of global GDP will continue to rise, and so too should its share of global stock-market capitalisation, opening it up to further opportunities for domestic companies. However, India’s ascent is far from certain yet. It will have to harness the opportunities presented by this positive investor sentiment effectively if it is to reach its full potential. It is worth noting that in the eight years after Prime Minister Modi launched his flagship ‘Make in India’ strategy in 2014, to drive up manufacturing as a share of the economy, manufacturing fell from 15.1% to 13.3% of India’s GDP. In China’s much larger economy, the ratio was 28%. Red tape, protectionist trade tariffs, an economy still heavily reliant on agriculture and the fact that only 25% of Indian women are currently economically active, compared to 71% in China, constitute significant obstacles that are holding India back. It will need further change to overcome the challenges ahead.
The issues raised in this blog, and many more, are explored at greater length in the Incredible India research paper.
1. Apple's Tim Cook and tech execs meet Indian Prime Minister Modi (cnbc.com)
Legal Disclaimer
Republication or redistribution of LSE Group content is prohibited without our prior written consent.
The content of this publication is for informational purposes only and has no legal effect, does not form part of any contract, does not, and does not seek to constitute advice of any nature and no reliance should be placed upon statements contained herein. Whilst reasonable efforts have been taken to ensure that the contents of this publication are accurate and reliable, LSE Group does not guarantee that this document is free from errors or omissions; therefore, you may not rely upon the content of this document under any circumstances and you should seek your own independent legal, investment, tax and other advice. Neither We nor our affiliates shall be liable for any errors, inaccuracies or delays in the publication or any other content, or for any actions taken by you in reliance thereon.
Copyright © 2024 London Stock Exchange Group. All rights reserved.
The content of this publication is provided by London Stock Exchange Group plc, its applicable group undertakings and/or its affiliates or licensors (the “LSE Group” or “We”) exclusively.
Neither We nor our affiliates guarantee the accuracy of or endorse the views or opinions given by any third party content provider, advertiser, sponsor or other user. We may link to, reference, or promote websites, applications and/or services from third parties. You agree that We are not responsible for, and do not control such non-LSE Group websites, applications or services.
The content of this publication is for informational purposes only. All information and data contained in this publication is obtained by LSE Group from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human and mechanical error as well as other factors, however, such information and data are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. You understand and agree that this publication does not, and does not seek to, constitute advice of any nature. You may not rely upon the content of this document under any circumstances and should seek your own independent legal, tax or investment advice or opinion regarding the suitability, value or profitability of any particular security, portfolio or investment strategy. Neither We nor our affiliates shall be liable for any errors, inaccuracies or delays in the publication or any other content, or for any actions taken by you in reliance thereon. You expressly agree that your use of the publication and its content is at your sole risk.
To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, LSE Group, expressly disclaims any representation or warranties, express or implied, including, without limitation, any representations or warranties of performance, merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, accuracy, completeness, reliability and non-infringement. LSE Group, its subsidiaries, its affiliates and their respective shareholders, directors, officers employees, agents, advertisers, content providers and licensors (collectively referred to as the “LSE Group Parties”) disclaim all responsibility for any loss, liability or damage of any kind resulting from or related to access, use or the unavailability of the publication (or any part of it); and none of the LSE Group Parties will be liable (jointly or severally) to you for any direct, indirect, consequential, special, incidental, punitive or exemplary damages, howsoever arising, even if any member of the LSE Group Parties are advised in advance of the possibility of such damages or could have foreseen any such damages arising or resulting from the use of, or inability to use, the information contained in the publication. For the avoidance of doubt, the LSE Group Parties shall have no liability for any losses, claims, demands, actions, proceedings, damages, costs or expenses arising out of, or in any way connected with, the information contained in this document.
LSE Group is the owner of various intellectual property rights ("IPR”), including but not limited to, numerous trademarks that are used to identify, advertise, and promote LSE Group products, services and activities. Nothing contained herein should be construed as granting any licence or right to use any of the trademarks or any other LSE Group IPR for any purpose whatsoever without the written permission or applicable licence terms.