Jane Goodland
According to ancient parable thought to have arisen in Mesopotamia around the 7th century BC, a group of builders who embarked on the uniquely technical and complex task of building the tallest tower ever suddenly found themselves speaking different languages. Although the goal was still the same, the lack of a common language led to the failure of the project.
The lesson of the Tower of Babel has not been lost on corporates large and small, tasked with disclosing a myriad of sustainability information in different ways. Nor has it been lost on international investors, who are grappling with the disparate pieces of information to inform their asset allocation decisions.
All this serves as an important reminder of how financial markets rely on a common language to operate effectively. Given that the current consensus on financial accounting standards took hundreds of years to evolve, it is perhaps unsurprising that consensus on sustainability metrics has proven allusive in recent years and a contradictory patchwork of standards, definitions and metrics has sprung up.
That is why the creation of the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) in late 2021 and its inaugural S1 and S2 sustainable reporting standards published this week are so important. They will deliver the practical, flexible and interoperable global baseline for corporate sustainability reporting that we urgently need.
To date, there has been a lack of comparable, investment grade data on sustainability. This has had a knock-on impact on disclosure levels amongst corporates globally. Even at the larger end of the market where reporting is more forthcoming, particularly in more carbon intensive sectors, 42 percent of all large and mid-cap listed companies globally do not report basic sustainability data, the greenhouse gas Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions. These are those associated with their direct to air emissions and those resulting from their energy use.
Outside of Europe and across emerging markets, the data is even scarcer. In China, of the approximately 1000 companies in FTSE China A Series only 10 percent report this data, and this figure is the same for the Russell 2000. At its most basic level, that’s a huge knowledge gap in investor portfolios that has not improved in several years.
This comes as we see substantial inflows into mutual fund and ETF investment products marketed for their environmental, social and governance credentials. LSEG’s Lipper business found that, excluding money markets, sustainable funds attracted £27.6bn in 2022 as their conventional peers suffered outflows of £66.9bn.
We believe that policymakers now have a unique opportunity to accelerate progress by introducing mandatory disclosure rules for companies which adopt or align with the ISSB standards by 2025. Doing so will facilitate better availability and consistency of sustainability-related information.
Many stakeholders have understood the critical importance of getting this right and the benefits it can bring to the increasing number of public-private partnerships focused on greening our energy sector. Better disclosure on metrics such as green revenues can help investors pinpoint opportunities and provide much needed capital for green growth.
We have seen several countries take a leading role already. Major financial centres including the UK, Hong Kong and Singapore have shown strong support for ISSB. Other countries have shown widespread adoption of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures’ recommendations, and adopting the ISSB standards which build on this framework is a logical next step.
Looking beyond the regulatory picture, investors are almost unanimously calling for a minimum coverage of sustainability disclosure. Availability of data was cited as the number one barrier to further sustainable investment adoption in a 2022 survey of asset owners conducted by LSEG’s global index provider, FTSE Russell. Concern about data quality or consistency of corporate reporting and disclosures followed in joint second.
As an example, the quality of green activities disclosure is central to support the transition to a low carbon economy. Indeed, FTSE Russell found that in a scenario where the global economy pivots to a 1.5°C path, the green economy exposure in global benchmarks would jump more than threefold from 2020 to 2030. This would have an immediate impact on the growing numbers of investors who use passive, index tracking strategies which replicate the composition of key benchmarks such as the Russell 1000 or FTSE Emerging Index.
But we still have a long way to go. Sustainability is about much more than climate and the ISSB is currently consulting on expanding its work to cover several other key areas including biodiversity and human rights.
This week marks an important milestone. To embed sustainability priorities like climate into the way financial markets operate we need a common language that can be used between the corporate and financial communities to invest and grow the industries of the future.
It’s essential that we now use ISSB to deliver a step-change in the quantity and quality of sustainability related information available. Doing so will mean our metaphorical tower of babel stands a chance of completion and financial markets will better serve society in facilitating solutions to the world’s biggest sustainability challenges.
Legal Disclaimer
Republication or redistribution of LSE Group content is prohibited without our prior written consent.
The content of this publication is for informational purposes only and has no legal effect, does not form part of any contract, does not, and does not seek to constitute advice of any nature and no reliance should be placed upon statements contained herein. Whilst reasonable efforts have been taken to ensure that the contents of this publication are accurate and reliable, LSE Group does not guarantee that this document is free from errors or omissions; therefore, you may not rely upon the content of this document under any circumstances and you should seek your own independent legal, investment, tax and other advice. Neither We nor our affiliates shall be liable for any errors, inaccuracies or delays in the publication or any other content, or for any actions taken by you in reliance thereon.
Copyright © 2023 London Stock Exchange Group. All rights reserved.
The content of this publication is provided by London Stock Exchange Group plc, its applicable group undertakings and/or its affiliates or licensors (the “LSE Group” or “We”) exclusively.
Neither We nor our affiliates guarantee the accuracy of or endorse the views or opinions given by any third party content provider, advertiser, sponsor or other user. We may link to, reference, or promote websites, applications and/or services from third parties. You agree that We are not responsible for, and do not control such non-LSE Group websites, applications or services.
The content of this publication is for informational purposes only. All information and data contained in this publication is obtained by LSE Group from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human and mechanical error as well as other factors, however, such information and data are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. You understand and agree that this publication does not, and does not seek to, constitute advice of any nature. You may not rely upon the content of this document under any circumstances and should seek your own independent legal, tax or investment advice or opinion regarding the suitability, value or profitability of any particular security, portfolio or investment strategy. Neither We nor our affiliates shall be liable for any errors, inaccuracies or delays in the publication or any other content, or for any actions taken by you in reliance thereon. You expressly agree that your use of the publication and its content is at your sole risk.
To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, LSE Group, expressly disclaims any representation or warranties, express or implied, including, without limitation, any representations or warranties of performance, merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, accuracy, completeness, reliability and non-infringement. LSE Group, its subsidiaries, its affiliates and their respective shareholders, directors, officers employees, agents, advertisers, content providers and licensors (collectively referred to as the “LSE Group Parties”) disclaim all responsibility for any loss, liability or damage of any kind resulting from or related to access, use or the unavailability of the publication (or any part of it); and none of the LSE Group Parties will be liable (jointly or severally) to you for any direct, indirect, consequential, special, incidental, punitive or exemplary damages, howsoever arising, even if any member of the LSE Group Parties are advised in advance of the possibility of such damages or could have foreseen any such damages arising or resulting from the use of, or inability to use, the information contained in the publication. For the avoidance of doubt, the LSE Group Parties shall have no liability for any losses, claims, demands, actions, proceedings, damages, costs or expenses arising out of, or in any way connected with, the information contained in this document.
LSE Group is the owner of various intellectual property rights ("IPR”), including but not limited to, numerous trademarks that are used to identify, advertise, and promote LSE Group products, services and activities. Nothing contained herein should be construed as granting any licence or right to use any of the trademarks or any other LSE Group IPR for any purpose whatsoever without the written permission or applicable licence terms.